Final merits determination — degree of expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although AAO stated it need not formally address the final merits determination given the petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, it nonetheless reviewed the record and concluded the petitioner had not established the required level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although AAO stated it need not formally address the final merits determination given the petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, it nonetheless reviewed the record and concluded the petitioner had not established the required level of expertise.
AAO affirmed that the nebulous nature of the Petitioner's proposed employment and endeavor prevented a determination of broader impact, and past accomplishments did not rise to the level needed to demonstrate the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance a nationally important endeavor.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that the nebulous nature of the Petitioner's proposed employment and endeavor prevented a determination of broader impact, and past accomplishments did not rise to the level needed to demonstrate the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance a nationally important endeavor.
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved remaining Dhanasar arguments, including any analysis of the third prong, because the identified reasons for dismissal were dispositive.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved remaining Dhanasar arguments, including any analysis of the third prong, because the identified reasons for dismissal were dispositive.
AAO agrees the licenses are unrelated to the technology field and that the presence of the Petitioner's app in the Apple Store does not function as comparable evidence of professional licensure.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the licenses are unrelated to the technology field and that the presence of the Petitioner's app in the Apple Store does not function as comparable evidence of professional licensure.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agrees the Petitioner did not document ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience. His pre-2015 work as a music artist/DJ was not shown to be in the same occupation as a tech CEO, and his entrepreneurial career since 2015 spanned less than seven years at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the Petitioner did not document ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience. His pre-2015 work as a music artist/DJ was not shown to be in the same occupation as a tech CEO, and his entrepreneurial career since 2015 spanned less than seven years at the time of filing.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of this criterion's outcome, making any finding purely advisory.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of this criterion's outcome, making any finding purely advisory.