10 years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employment letters were deficient: one post-dated the filing, another was undated, unsigned, and misgendered the Petitioner, a third lacked duty descriptions or full-time confirmation, and two letters established only work as an administrative assistant and logistics intern—not as a human development specialist.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment letters were deficient: one post-dated the filing, another was undated, unsigned, and misgendered the Petitioner, a third lacked duty descriptions or full-time confirmation, and two letters established only work as an administrative assistant and logistics intern—not as a human development specialist.
Official academic record showing degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The general secretary's letter from PUC is unsigned and carries little probative weight, and AAO could not verify accreditation from the referenced ordinances and decrees. The AACRAO EDGE database does not confirm the post-graduate lato sensu course is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree; at most the Petitioner holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The general secretary's letter from PUC is unsigned and carries little probative weight, and AAO could not verify accreditation from the referenced ordinances and decrees. The AACRAO EDGE database does not confirm the post-graduate lato sensu course is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree; at most the Petitioner holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's professional accomplishments appear to have affected her clients or employers but do not substantiate field- or industry-level recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's professional accomplishments appear to have affected her clients or employers but do not substantiate field- or industry-level recognition.
AAO does not disturb the Director's finding that the leading or critical role criterion was met; the remand focuses on the other criteria where comparable evidence was not considered.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not disturb the Director's finding that the leading or critical role criterion was met; the remand focuses on the other criteria where comparable evidence was not considered.