可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 6931–6940

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The issuing organizations' own websites describe the certifications as 'entry-level competency-based examinations,' establishing basic nursing competence rather than excellence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The issuing organizations' own websites describe the certifications as 'entry-level competency-based examinations,' establishing basic nursing competence rather than excellence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_03_B2203; source_row=34307
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on appeal, effectively waiving review of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on appeal, effectively waiving review of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_03_B2203; source_row=34309
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published materials in major media or other qualifying publications

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, it could not change the outcome given the Petitioner failed to satisfy three criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, it could not change the outcome given the Petitioner failed to satisfy three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_02_B2203; source_row=34296
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the same or allied field

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, it could not change the outcome, and the Petitioner also waived it by not pursuing it on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because even if met, it could not change the outcome, and the Petitioner also waived it by not pursuing it on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_02_B2203; source_row=34297
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

Leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions on appeal, so the AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions on appeal, so the AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=34290
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

High salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not submit evidence showing her salary or remuneration was high relative to compensation paid to others working in the same field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit evidence showing her salary or remuneration was high relative to compensation paid to others working in the same field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=34291
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 重大国际奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 重大国际奖项

Major internationally recognized award

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=34283
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidence requirement of at least three criteria, but noted the record does not support sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidence requirement of at least three criteria, but noted the record does not support sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=34292
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=34289
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her arguments went to the importance of education broadly rather than the national importance of her specific proposed work. She did not demonstrate broader implications, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects attributable to her future work.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her arguments went to the importance of education broadly rather than the national importance of her specific proposed work. She did not demonstrate broader implications, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects attributable to her future work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-31_04_B5203; source_row=34273
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评