可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 7021–7030

EB-1Aother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

other

good and sufficient cause for NOIR/revocation

证据为何得到认可

AAO concludes the NOIR properly articulated why the unrebutted record at approval would have warranted denial under (h)(3)(v), satisfying Matter of Estime and Matter of Ho, and that the standard does not require showing clear error by the approving officer.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the NOIR properly articulated why the unrebutted record at approval would have warranted denial under (h)(3)(v), satisfying Matter of Estime and Matter of Ho, and that the standard does not require showing clear error by the approving officer.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=34129
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepts the Director's prior determination that the judging criterion was satisfied; not disputed on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepts the Director's prior determination that the judging criterion was satisfied; not disputed on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=34130
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the first prong on the merits but found that the Director's analysis was conclusory and failed to address the Petitioner's specific claims about economic effects, societal welfare, and national-importance factors that the Director had asked the Petitioner to address in the RFE.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the first prong on the merits but found that the Director's analysis was conclusory and failed to address the Petitioner's specific claims about economic effects, societal welfare, and national-importance factors that the Director had asked the Petitioner to address in the RFE.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=34134
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO found that the Director applied heightened standards outside the scope of the second prong and was dismissive of relevant evidence including academic credentials, awards, media coverage, recommendation letters, and a business plan.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Director applied heightened standards outside the scope of the second prong and was dismissive of relevant evidence including academic credentials, awards, media coverage, recommendation letters, and a business plan.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=34135
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO faulted the Director for not identifying or discussing the evidence weighed in the balancing analysis and for an unsupported finding that the Petitioner is merely a manager; the record (formation documents, tax returns, financial records) indicates he is both a member and manager of the LLC, making labor certification impractical.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO faulted the Director for not identifying or discussing the evidence weighed in the balancing analysis and for an unsupported finding that the Petitioner is merely a manager; the record (formation documents, tax returns, financial records) indicates he is both a member and manager of the LLC, making labor certification impractical.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_01_B5203; source_row=34136
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

The AAO reserved analysis of the third prong because the failure to meet the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved analysis of the third prong because the failure to meet the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_02_B5203; source_row=34145
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学学士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

The AAO reserved analysis of the second prong because the failure to meet the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved analysis of the second prong because the failure to meet the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_02_B5203; source_row=34144
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床2,021 篇论文5 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on evidence of peer review services for scientific journals in the medical field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the judging criterion based on evidence of peer review services for scientific journals in the medical field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=34139
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床2,021 篇论文5 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion based on evidence of co-authored publications in professional medical journals and conference proceedings.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion based on evidence of co-authored publications in professional medical journals and conference proceedings.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=34141
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO expressly reserved argument on the third prong because the Petitioner's failure on prong two was dispositive and detailed discussion of prong three could not change the outcome.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved argument on the third prong because the Petitioner's failure on prong two was dispositive and detailed discussion of prong three could not change the outcome.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-20_03_B5203; source_row=34148
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评