high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
证据为何得到认可
The AAO found that the employment agreement, which reflected the salary the Petitioner 'has commanded' as a nuclear medicine physician, was the proper comparator—not his later W-2 salary in a department director role. Upon de novo review, the AAO concluded the comparative wage data established that the Petitioner commanded a high salary relative to others in the nuclear medicine field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the employment agreement, which reflected the salary the Petitioner 'has commanded' as a nuclear medicine physician, was the proper comparator—not his later W-2 salary in a department director role. Upon de novo review, the AAO concluded the comparative wage data established that the Petitioner commanded a high salary relative to others in the nuclear medicine field.
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the importance of the physical therapy profession with the specific impact of his proposed endeavor, which was a small home health care company projected to employ 33 workers across several cities with no demonstrated nationally significant economic effect.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the importance of the physical therapy profession with the specific impact of his proposed endeavor, which was a small home health care company projected to employ 33 workers across several cities with no demonstrated nationally significant economic effect. The business plan's revenue projections were unsupported, and the HUBZone plan was undermined by an unexplained ownership eligibility issue and below-market wages for physical therapists.
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's work experience letters do not state whether she was employed full-time, so the required ten years of full-time work experience in her occupation is not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's work experience letters do not state whether she was employed full-time, so the required ten years of full-time work experience in her occupation is not established.
license or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Brazilian veterinary identification card was expired as of the filing date and therefore cannot satisfy the criterion requiring a license or certification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Brazilian veterinary identification card was expired as of the filing date and therefore cannot satisfy the criterion requiring a license or certification.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
Support letters and news stories recognize accomplishments that benefitted the Petitioner's employers and customers but do not identify any significant contributions to the broader field of veterinary medicine.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Support letters and news stories recognize accomplishments that benefitted the Petitioner's employers and customers but do not identify any significant contributions to the broader field of veterinary medicine.