AAO implicitly affirmed the Director's finding that prong two was met, noting the issue of skills and experience relates to the second prong which 'shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national,' but prong two was not disputed.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO implicitly affirmed the Director's finding that prong two was met, noting the issue of skills and experience relates to the second prong which 'shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national,' but prong two was not disputed.
AAO found the Director's second-prong analysis was tainted by references to facts and evidence from an unrelated petition, making it unclear whether the Director actually analyzed the Petitioner's own evidence. AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's second-prong analysis was tainted by references to facts and evidence from an unrelated petition, making it unclear whether the Director actually analyzed the Petitioner's own evidence. AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The client letters described the Petitioner's relationships and skills but did not establish achievements or significant contributions in the international trade field. One example of helping a client find a supplier during COVID-19 lacked sufficient detail to constitute a significant contribution.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The client letters described the Petitioner's relationships and skills but did not establish achievements or significant contributions in the international trade field. One example of helping a client find a supplier during COVID-19 lacked sufficient detail to constitute a significant contribution.
The AAO found that the Petitioner lacks a post-secondary degree, so the organization's members were not shown to be 'professional' under the regulatory definition, and the letter's signatory was the owner of one of the Petitioner's Brazilian clients, raising bias concerns.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner lacks a post-secondary degree, so the organization's members were not shown to be 'professional' under the regulatory definition, and the letter's signatory was the owner of one of the Petitioner's Brazilian clients, raising bias concerns.
official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the academic record did not indicate completion of a degree, and the marketing certificate was from a three-day course, so the documentation did not demonstrate academic credentials exceeding those ordinarily encountered in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the academic record did not indicate completion of a degree, and the marketing certificate was from a three-day course, so the documentation did not demonstrate academic credentials exceeding those ordinarily encountered in the field.
letters from employers showing at least ten years of full-time experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found the self-signed letter lacked credibility because the Petitioner is a party to the proceedings, and the bank manager's letter was undermined by the company's Brazilian business registration showing it was a bicycle wholesaler and retailer rather than an international trade firm, leaving inconsistencies unresolved.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the self-signed letter lacked credibility because the Petitioner is a party to the proceedings, and the bank manager's letter was undermined by the company's Brazilian business registration showing it was a bicycle wholesaler and retailer rather than an international trade firm, leaving inconsistencies unresolved.
commanded a salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found the Petitioner has an uneven income history—including only $6,136 in 2019 and variable amounts in prior years—and the record does not demonstrate that his remuneration exceeds those of other international trade consultants.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the Petitioner has an uneven income history—including only $6,136 in 2019 and variable amounts in prior years—and the record does not demonstrate that his remuneration exceeds those of other international trade consultants.