可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 7361–7370

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the endeavor lacked national importance. The record did not sufficiently demonstrate how wider adoption of multi-factor authentication would impact the field nationally or globally, the advisory opinion letters were authored by non-experts in cybersecurity and did not analyze national importance, and the part-time job creation plans lacked specificity as to locality or economic impact.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor lacked national importance. The record did not sufficiently demonstrate how wider adoption of multi-factor authentication would impact the field nationally or globally, the advisory opinion letters were authored by non-experts in cybersecurity and did not analyze national importance, and the part-time job creation plans lacked specificity as to locality or economic impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_07_B5203; source_row=33595
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

commanding salary demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record did not reflect the salary expected for individuals of exceptional ability performing comparable duties, and the broad job description of systems analysts did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as a cybersecurity technology entrepreneur.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record did not reflect the salary expected for individuals of exceptional ability performing comparable duties, and the broad job description of systems analysts did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as a cybersecurity technology entrepreneur.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_07_B5203; source_row=33592
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

commanded a salary or other remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed with the Director that the salary evidence could not be evaluated because the record lacked comparable compensation data for financial analysts of exceptional ability, and the bank manager job descriptions did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed financial analyst duties.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the salary evidence could not be evaluated because the record lacked comparable compensation data for financial analysts of exceptional ability, and the bank manager job descriptions did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed financial analyst duties.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_04_B5203; source_row=33570
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in professional associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Trade Union of Employees in Bank and Financial Establishments is a trade union, not a professional association as contemplated by the regulation, and the record did not describe its composition or establish it as a professional association.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Trade Union of Employees in Bank and Financial Establishments is a trade union, not a professional association as contemplated by the regulation, and the record did not describe its composition or establish it as a professional association.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_04_B5203; source_row=33571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned, finding the record lacked a record of success in the U.S. medical device industry, an adequate business plan, sufficient evidence of progress, or interest from potential customers at the time of filing.…

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned, finding the record lacked a record of success in the U.S. medical device industry, an adequate business plan, sufficient evidence of progress, or interest from potential customers at the time of filing. The post-filing consultancy agreement could not establish eligibility as of the petition date, and the recommendation letters focused entirely on work in Brazil rather than the U.S. market.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B5203; source_row=33559
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO reaffirmed its prior aggregate review concluding the Petitioner had not shown sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reaffirmed its prior aggregate review concluding the Petitioner had not shown sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B2203; source_row=33557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO reaffirmed that the Petitioner did not show his particular role on team projects was critical to a definable operational component of any organization, and submitted no evidence that the agencies themselves had distinguished reputations beyond the prominence of their clients.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reaffirmed that the Petitioner did not show his particular role on team projects was critical to a definable operational component of any organization, and submitted no evidence that the agencies themselves had distinguished reputations beyond the prominence of their clients.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B2203; source_row=33556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他工程师

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the identified deficiencies on the proposed endeavor and the first prong were dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the identified deficiencies on the proposed endeavor and the first prong were dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_09_B5203; source_row=33603
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他工程师

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong deficiency and the undefined proposed endeavor were dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong deficiency and the undefined proposed endeavor were dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_09_B5203; source_row=33602
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融学士

审查的问题

license or certification

license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner conceded she does not have a professional license or CPA certification. Membership in the South Carolina Association of CPAs does not satisfy the requirement of a license or certification, and future eligibility cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner conceded she does not have a professional license or CPA certification. Membership in the South Carolina Association of CPAs does not satisfy the requirement of a license or certification, and future eligibility cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_05_B5203; source_row=33578
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评