可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 7401–7410

NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepted the Director's determination that this criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted the Director's determination that this criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_04_B5203; source_row=33543
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that exceptional performance in the opinion of peers at a single employer does not establish recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations on a scale beyond that employer.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that exceptional performance in the opinion of peers at a single employer does not establish recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations on a scale beyond that employer.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_04_B5203; source_row=33548
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the record did not establish ten years of full-time employment, finding that only the May 2019 to January 2021 period was attested as full-time and that inconsistencies between the initial filing and RFE response were not resolved with independent objective evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the record did not establish ten years of full-time employment, finding that only the May 2019 to January 2021 period was attested as full-time and that inconsistencies between the initial filing and RFE response were not resolved with independent objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_04_B5203; source_row=33546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Adequacy of NOID notice under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(8)(iv)

AAO 为什么未被说服

Because the NOID did not identify ETA Form 750B and ETA Form 9089 as the missing evidence underlying the proposed denial, the denial on that basis deprived the petitioner of the adequate notice and opportunity to respond required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(8)(iv).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the NOID did not identify ETA Form 750B and ETA Form 9089 as the missing evidence underlying the proposed denial, the denial on that basis deprived the petitioner of the adequate notice and opportunity to respond required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(8)(iv).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_03_B5203; source_row=33542
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner limited his motion to prong two only; prong three was not raised on motion.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner limited his motion to prong two only; prong three was not raised on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=33555
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner limited his motion to prong two only; prong one was not raised on motion.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner limited his motion to prong two only; prong one was not raised on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=33554
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

The AAO noted that the reference letters describing the Petitioner's prior engineering work are pertinent to the second Dhanasar prong, but did not reach a final merits determination on this prong because the first prong was not met.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO noted that the reference letters describing the Petitioner's prior engineering work are pertinent to the second Dhanasar prong, but did not reach a final merits determination on this prong because the first prong was not met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_02_B5203; source_row=33540
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Evidence from industry publications about the importance of project management in the oil and gas industry, and the Petitioner's role in individual construction or repair projects, does not show that his proposed activities would affect the oil and gas industry more broadly or extend beyond benefits to his employer and its clients.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Evidence from industry publications about the importance of project management in the oil and gas industry, and the Petitioner's role in individual construction or repair projects, does not show that his proposed activities would affect the oil and gas industry more broadly or extend beyond benefits to his employer and its clients.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_02_B5203; source_row=33539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements

裁决如何说明

The AAO did not address the third Dhanasar prong in this motion decision.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not address the third Dhanasar prong in this motion decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-12_02_B5203; source_row=33541
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

Substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's business plan projections (88 jobs, $15M wages, $2.4M in taxes over five years) were unsubstantiated and insufficient to rise to national importance. Industry reports addressed the importance of the finance sector generally, not the Petitioner's specific endeavor.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's business plan projections (88 jobs, $15M wages, $2.4M in taxes over five years) were unsubstantiated and insufficient to rise to national importance. Industry reports addressed the importance of the finance sector generally, not the Petitioner's specific endeavor. Recommendation letters and the expert opinion focused on the Petitioner's qualifications (relevant to prong two) rather than the prospective impact of his endeavor on the field. The Petitioner failed to establish any original innovations or broader implications beyond servicing his own clients.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_05_B5203; source_row=33525
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评