The AAO found the record does not show the prospective impact of the Petitioner's IT consulting and tracking technology business rises to national importance. The expert letter addressed the national importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the business plan's staffing and revenue projections were unsupported.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the record does not show the prospective impact of the Petitioner's IT consulting and tracking technology business rises to national importance. The expert letter addressed the national importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the business plan's staffing and revenue projections were unsupported. The Petitioner did not show his work would impact the transportation industry, IT consulting field, or U.S. economy more broadly.
advanced degree professional qualification (five years post-baccalaureate experience)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision. Even using the earlier June 2000 course completion date, the evidence — principally Articles of Incorporation and vague client letters — did not demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in business administration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision. Even using the earlier June 2000 course completion date, the evidence — principally Articles of Incorporation and vague client letters — did not demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in business administration.
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting that the Petitioner failed to explain how her work experience relates to the proposed field and did not submit additional evidence on appeal. Additionally, even proven experience could not substitute for a baccalaureate degree or its equivalent, which the Petitioner had not demonstrated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting that the Petitioner failed to explain how her work experience relates to the proposed field and did not submit additional evidence on appeal. Additionally, even proven experience could not substitute for a baccalaureate degree or its equivalent, which the Petitioner had not demonstrated.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the Petitioner was the lead host, he did not show how the shows qualify as organizations or establishments under the criterion, nor that the production company has a distinguished reputation. The charity event occurred after filing and cannot establish eligibility.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner was the lead host, he did not show how the shows qualify as organizations or establishments under the criterion, nor that the production company has a distinguished reputation. The charity event occurred after filing and cannot establish eligibility.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The record does not show that the Telenedelya or Cosmopolitan-Ukraine awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the five reality-show awards were received by the show, not the Petitioner personally.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record does not show that the Telenedelya or Cosmopolitan-Ukraine awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the five reality-show awards were received by the show, not the Petitioner personally.
The issue is not whether the Petitioner contributed in some manner, but whether his original artistic contributions are of major significance in the field of entertainment, and the motion provides no new evidence overcoming the prior conclusions.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The issue is not whether the Petitioner contributed in some manner, but whether his original artistic contributions are of major significance in the field of entertainment, and the motion provides no new evidence overcoming the prior conclusions.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Many of the articles were interviews unrelated to his work in the field (covering topics like the kind of girls he likes or his preferred football league), and the Petitioner did not show how the publications' circulation compares to others.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Many of the articles were interviews unrelated to his work in the field (covering topics like the kind of girls he likes or his preferred football league), and the Petitioner did not show how the publications' circulation compares to others.