AAO disagreed with the Director's exclusion of the business plan but, considering it on de novo review, still found the proposed lone consultancy did not have national-level implications or substantial positive economic effects, with unsupported growth and revenue projections.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director's exclusion of the business plan but, considering it on de novo review, still found the proposed lone consultancy did not have national-level implications or substantial positive economic effects, with unsupported growth and revenue projections.
AAO declined to reach this issue because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the national interest waiver, making the EB-2 threshold question unnecessary to the outcome.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this issue because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the national interest waiver, making the EB-2 threshold question unnecessary to the outcome.
published material about the alien in professional or major media
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved this criterion because the Petitioner met only one other criterion and could not reach the three required regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved this criterion because the Petitioner met only one other criterion and could not reach the three required regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
AAO found that only the Petitioner's work as an intern and junior human resources analyst (~76 months) was the same or similar to human resources specialist duties, which fell short of the required 120 months. Earlier roles as apprentice, receptionist, and administrative assistant did not correspond to human resources specialist duties.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that only the Petitioner's work as an intern and junior human resources analyst (~76 months) was the same or similar to human resources specialist duties, which fell short of the required 120 months. Earlier roles as apprentice, receptionist, and administrative assistant did not correspond to human resources specialist duties.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the letters of recommendation contained complimentary statements about job performance but did not demonstrate achievements or contributions reflecting expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the letters of recommendation contained complimentary statements about job performance but did not demonstrate achievements or contributions reflecting expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered. Certificates reflected professional education rather than exceptional achievement, a media quote was insufficiently explained, and photos of professional events did not demonstrate extraordinary achievements or contributions.