可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 7531–7540

NIWEB-1A · 专业协会会员已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in professional associations

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed this criterion was met based on the submitted evidence of professional organization membership.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed this criterion was met based on the submitted evidence of professional organization membership.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_08_B5203; source_row=33344
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

license or certification

license or certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the submitted licensure and certification applied to the occupation of 'administrator' rather than human resources specialist, and the record did not establish that any license or certification is a prerequisite for human resources specialists in the US or Brazil.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted licensure and certification applied to the occupation of 'administrator' rather than human resources specialist, and the record did not establish that any license or certification is a prerequisite for human resources specialists in the US or Brazil.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_08_B5203; source_row=33342
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

The third Dhanasar prong was not separately addressed by AAO in the motion decision, as the motion was dismissed on the basis of the first two prongs.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The third Dhanasar prong was not separately addressed by AAO in the motion decision, as the motion was dismissed on the basis of the first two prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_04_B5203; source_row=33330
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the third prong because the failure on national importance under the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the third prong because the failure on national importance under the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_07_B5203; source_row=33339
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the second prong because the failure on national importance under the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the second prong because the failure on national importance under the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_07_B5203; source_row=33338
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to reach the issue.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to reach the issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_10_B5203; source_row=33355
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to reach the issue.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to reach the issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_10_B5203; source_row=33356
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

At least three of six evidentiary criteria (step 1)

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met at least three of the six evidentiary criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met at least three of the six evidentiary criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-24_13_B5203; source_row=33364
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, finding that the evidence showed at most that his services might benefit individual employers, not the oil and gas industry or national economy at the level contemplated by Dhanasar.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, finding that the evidence showed at most that his services might benefit individual employers, not the oil and gas industry or national economy at the level contemplated by Dhanasar. The relevant inquiry is the impact of the specific proposed endeavor, not the importance of the industry as a whole, and the Petitioner provided insufficient evidence of projected economic impact or job creation attributable to his work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-23_05_B5203; source_row=33314
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Advanced degree or equivalent qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the master's degree cannot establish eligibility because it postdates filing. The updated bank certification still lacks specific duty descriptions and does not establish progressive experience in the pastoral specialty.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the master's degree cannot establish eligibility because it postdates filing. The updated bank certification still lacks specific duty descriptions and does not establish progressive experience in the pastoral specialty.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-23_04_B5203; source_row=33310
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评