AAO reaffirmed that the proposed endeavor lacks national or global implications beyond the employing organizations and that the record does not show substantial positive economic effects. Petitioner's NYSDOT-based comparisons were rejected because NYSDOT was vacated by Dhanasar.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reaffirmed that the proposed endeavor lacks national or global implications beyond the employing organizations and that the record does not show substantial positive economic effects. Petitioner's NYSDOT-based comparisons were rejected because NYSDOT was vacated by Dhanasar.
original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
While the Petitioner's efforts may have been important to her employer, AAO found no evidence they were original or remarkably influenced the field of journalism. The record lacked documentary evidence that she broke new ground or that others implemented online presence based on a model she developed.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner's efforts may have been important to her employer, AAO found no evidence they were original or remarkably influenced the field of journalism. The record lacked documentary evidence that she broke new ground or that others implemented online presence based on a model she developed.
The AAO agreed that a shortage of professionals alone does not render an individual physician's work nationally important, the letters of support address her qualifications (relevant to prong two, not prong one), and neither her economic impact claims nor her breast implant illness articles sufficed to show her prospective work rises to the level of national importance under Dhanasar.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that a shortage of professionals alone does not render an individual physician's work nationally important, the letters of support address her qualifications (relevant to prong two, not prong one), and neither her economic impact claims nor her breast implant illness articles sufficed to show her prospective work rises to the level of national importance under Dhanasar.
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance because the record does not show how the institute would impact the field or economy beyond its students and clients. The professional plan's projections were unsupported by probative evidence, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance because the record does not show how the institute would impact the field or economy beyond its students and clients. The professional plan's projections were unsupported by probative evidence, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
AAO found the Petitioner holds only a bachelor's equivalent degree and the letters submitted to prove progressive experience do not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B) because they are not from employers, lack employment dates, and do not indicate full-time status.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner holds only a bachelor's equivalent degree and the letters submitted to prove progressive experience do not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B) because they are not from employers, lack employment dates, and do not indicate full-time status.
The MBA course certificate lacked an evaluation establishing it as a degree above a bachelor's degree. The academic evaluation relied on the bachelor's degree plus years of experience for equivalency, but the record did not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience because employer letters were inadequate and the personal accountant's letter could not substitute for required employer letters.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The MBA course certificate lacked an evaluation establishing it as a degree above a bachelor's degree. The academic evaluation relied on the bachelor's degree plus years of experience for equivalency, but the record did not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience because employer letters were inadequate and the personal accountant's letter could not substitute for required employer letters.
AAO agreed with the Director that while the endeavor had substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The business plan projections were unsupported, expert opinions addressed the general importance of accounting rather than the specific endeavor's prospective impact, and general assertions of economic benefits were not corroborated by independent evidence.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that while the endeavor had substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The business plan projections were unsupported, expert opinions addressed the general importance of accounting rather than the specific endeavor's prospective impact, and general assertions of economic benefits were not corroborated by independent evidence.
AICPA membership requirements were not established as requiring a U.S. bachelor's degree or equivalent, so AICPA was not shown to be a 'professional association' under the regulations. Similarly, the Petitioner did not establish that the Regional Council of Accounting requires members to hold at least the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AICPA membership requirements were not established as requiring a U.S. bachelor's degree or equivalent, so AICPA was not shown to be a 'professional association' under the regulations. Similarly, the Petitioner did not establish that the Regional Council of Accounting requires members to hold at least the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.