AAO declined to reach a conclusion on prong two and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence and articulate the basis for any finding on whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance his endeavor.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach a conclusion on prong two and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence and articulate the basis for any finding on whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance his endeavor.
The personal accountant's letter is not a letter from an employer as required. Colleague letters lacked dates of employment and confirmation of full-time status. The record therefore does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The personal accountant's letter is not a letter from an employer as required. Colleague letters lacked dates of employment and confirmation of full-time status. The record therefore does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters and training certificates demonstrated the Petitioner's work ethic and continued professional development, but did not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters and training certificates demonstrated the Petitioner's work ethic and continued professional development, but did not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
The identity card merely identifies the Petitioner as an accountant registered with a regional council; it does not constitute a license to practice the profession or a certification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The identity card merely identifies the Petitioner as an accountant registered with a regional council; it does not constitute a license to practice the profession or a certification.
The submitted employer letters together demonstrated only six years and two months of full-time experience in the occupation, which is less than the ten years required. An employment certificate from a third employer did not specify work duties or confirm full-time status. A letter from a post-filing employer could not be used to establish eligibility at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted employer letters together demonstrated only six years and two months of full-time experience in the occupation, which is less than the ten years required. An employment certificate from a third employer did not specify work duties or confirm full-time status. A letter from a post-filing employer could not be used to establish eligibility at the time of filing.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters and certificates showed work experience, training, and praise from employers and co-workers, but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters and certificates showed work experience, training, and praise from employers and co-workers, but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.