on balance beneficial to waive job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO expressly declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive finding against the Petitioner on the first prong and EB-2 eligibility.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive finding against the Petitioner on the first prong and EB-2 eligibility.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not meet criterion (F), finding the letters of recommendation contained only vague, unsupported statements about the Petitioner's skills, the copyright registration was not evidence of achievement or significant contribution, and the publications and speaking engagements were largely promotional without demonstrating exceptional contributions to the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner did not meet criterion (F), finding the letters of recommendation contained only vague, unsupported statements about the Petitioner's skills, the copyright registration was not evidence of achievement or significant contribution, and the publications and speaking engagements were largely promotional without demonstrating exceptional contributions to the field.
AAO expressly declined to reach the second prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive finding against the Petitioner on the first prong and EB-2 eligibility.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly declined to reach the second prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive finding against the Petitioner on the first prong and EB-2 eligibility.
AAO reserved prong two as unnecessary to reach given the failure on prong one, citing INS v. Bagamasbad. AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner had not provided evidence of a U.S. nursing license, which would be relevant under this prong in any future filing.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved prong two as unnecessary to reach given the failure on prong one, citing INS v. Bagamasbad. AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner had not provided evidence of a U.S. nursing license, which would be relevant under this prong in any future filing.