AAO agreed the petitioner failed the second prong, finding that his RFE response materially changed the proposed endeavor from HVAC services through a startup to employment in oil well drilling, and this post-filing change cannot retroactively establish eligibility.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the petitioner failed the second prong, finding that his RFE response materially changed the proposed endeavor from HVAC services through a startup to employment in oil well drilling, and this post-filing change cannot retroactively establish eligibility.
AAO found the petitioner qualifies under the baccalaureate-plus-five-years-experience alternative, based on a 2005 bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and employer letters showing progressive experience from July 2006 to September 2015.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner qualifies under the baccalaureate-plus-five-years-experience alternative, based on a 2005 bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and employer letters showing progressive experience from July 2006 to September 2015.
AAO noted the material change in the proposed endeavor negatively impacts eligibility under the first prong, but declined to analyze it because the petitioner fails the second prong and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the material change in the proposed endeavor negatively impacts eligibility under the first prong, but declined to analyze it because the petitioner fails the second prong and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
AAO noted the material change in the proposed endeavor negatively impacts eligibility under the third prong, but declined to analyze it because the petitioner fails the second prong and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the material change in the proposed endeavor negatively impacts eligibility under the third prong, but declined to analyze it because the petitioner fails the second prong and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
AAO agreed that the proposed IT consulting services to small businesses, while potentially locally beneficial, did not demonstrate prospective impact rising to a level of national importance. The claimed benefits of job creation, tax revenue, and efficient business operations lacked record support for broader national-level implications.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the proposed IT consulting services to small businesses, while potentially locally beneficial, did not demonstrate prospective impact rising to a level of national importance. The claimed benefits of job creation, tax revenue, and efficient business operations lacked record support for broader national-level implications.