AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her proposed endeavor of providing tax consulting services would not extend sufficiently beyond her own company and clientele to impact the field or U.S. economy at the level of national importance.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her proposed endeavor of providing tax consulting services would not extend sufficiently beyond her own company and clientele to impact the field or U.S. economy at the level of national importance. Job creation of 12 employees and a local business plan were insufficient, and the expert letter primarily addressed the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor.
AAO found that the Petitioner's diploma was not independently equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and that combining lesser educational credentials with experience cannot satisfy the regulatory requirement for at least a single bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's diploma was not independently equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and that combining lesser educational credentials with experience cannot satisfy the regulatory requirement for at least a single bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent.
The AAO declined to consider this evidence as untimely, but noted regardless that the documentation does not show high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to other electrical engineers.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider this evidence as untimely, but noted regardless that the documentation does not show high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to other electrical engineers.
The descriptions, photographs, and statements do not show the nature or major significance of any original contributions, and there is no evidence the work has influenced the field of electrical engineering.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The descriptions, photographs, and statements do not show the nature or major significance of any original contributions, and there is no evidence the work has influenced the field of electrical engineering.
The AAO declined to consider this evidence as untimely, but noted regardless that the evidence does not show a leading or critical role for a distinguished organization.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider this evidence as untimely, but noted regardless that the evidence does not show a leading or critical role for a distinguished organization.
The Red Dot award was given to a product and the company that designed it, not the petitioner, and the student awards lack evidence of national or international recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Red Dot award was given to a product and the company that designed it, not the petitioner, and the student awards lack evidence of national or international recognition.
The documentation does not demonstrate the petitioner judged the work of others, individually or on a panel, in electrical engineering or an allied field.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The documentation does not demonstrate the petitioner judged the work of others, individually or on a panel, in electrical engineering or an allied field.
The AAO declined to consider this evidence because it was not presented before the Director, but noted regardless that the documentation does not constitute evidence of association memberships requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider this evidence because it was not presented before the Director, but noted regardless that the documentation does not constitute evidence of association memberships requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
The AAO declined to consider the new evidence because it was not presented before the Director, but noted that regardless, the report was not shown to be in a professional or major trade publication or other form of major media.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider the new evidence because it was not presented before the Director, but noted that regardless, the report was not shown to be in a professional or major trade publication or other form of major media.