AAO agreed the business plan lacked revenue and job projections and described hiring only one employee; the submitted articles related to the agricultural sector generally but not to the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the potential to create one job is not 'significant' under Dhanasar; and the indirect job-creation argument was unsupported by documentary evidence.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the business plan lacked revenue and job projections and described hiring only one employee; the submitted articles related to the agricultural sector generally but not to the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the potential to create one job is not 'significant' under Dhanasar; and the indirect job-creation argument was unsupported by documentary evidence.
AAO found that documentation showing the Petitioner performed at music exhibitions including concerts in Florida satisfied the artistic display criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that documentation showing the Petitioner performed at music exhibitions including concerts in Florida satisfied the artistic display criterion.
AAO found that a letter from a Christian music institute indicating the Petitioner served on 'final exam juries' to determine if music trainees met graduation requirements satisfied the judging criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a letter from a Christian music institute indicating the Petitioner served on 'final exam juries' to determine if music trainees met graduation requirements satisfied the judging criterion.
AAO found the Petitioner met the alternative path by showing a foreign equivalent baccalaureate degree plus five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty, evidenced by employer letters and affidavits.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner met the alternative path by showing a foreign equivalent baccalaureate degree plus five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty, evidenced by employer letters and affidavits.
AAO agreed the evidence supports a finding of substantial merit for the proposed endeavor, but remanded the question of national importance for the Director to evaluate with adequate analysis, noting that the Director must focus on the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor rather than the field generally.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the evidence supports a finding of substantial merit for the proposed endeavor, but remanded the question of national importance for the Director to evaluate with adequate analysis, noting that the Director must focus on the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor rather than the field generally.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO remanded for the Director to evaluate the Petitioner's arguments regarding this prong, including those made on appeal, and determine whether the record supports a finding that waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO remanded for the Director to evaluate the Petitioner's arguments regarding this prong, including those made on appeal, and determine whether the record supports a finding that waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.