可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 7180

EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

证据为何得到认可

AAO found this criterion satisfied based on various articles about the Petitioner published in major newspapers and media over two decades.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on various articles about the Petitioner published in major newspapers and media over two decades.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_04_B2203; source_row=45200
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display

证据为何得到认可

AAO found this criterion satisfied based on evidence of the Petitioner's performances and music videos displayed at concerts, shows, and other events.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on evidence of the Petitioner's performances and music videos displayed at concerts, shows, and other events.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_04_B2203; source_row=45202
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO found this criterion satisfied based on letters documenting the Petitioner's participation as a judge in two television talent-hunt programs.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on letters documenting the Petitioner's participation as a judge in two television talent-hunt programs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_04_B2203; source_row=45201
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

Both SCOPS and AAO found the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of his participation as a judge of others' work in his field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both SCOPS and AAO found the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of his participation as a judge of others' work in his field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_02_B2203; source_row=45178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial successes in the performing arts

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner claimed this criterion in his combined motions to reopen and reconsider but omitted the claim on appeal, effectively waiving it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner claimed this criterion in his combined motions to reopen and reconsider but omitted the claim on appeal, effectively waiving it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_02_B2203; source_row=45183
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published materials in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

Because the Petitioner declined to rely on web-traffic analytics, he could not demonstrate major trade publications. The 2017 article's publisher was an online magazine for women—not a professional publication—and the 2021 article appeared in a retail store blog intended for musicians and music lovers broadly, not professional musicians specifically.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner declined to rely on web-traffic analytics, he could not demonstrate major trade publications. The 2017 article's publisher was an online magazine for women—not a professional publication—and the 2021 article appeared in a retail store blog intended for musicians and music lovers broadly, not professional musicians specifically.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_02_B2203; source_row=45177
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

Both SCOPS and AAO found the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of display of his work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both SCOPS and AAO found the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of display of his work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_02_B2203; source_row=45180
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

published material about the petitioner in major media (articles about petitioner and work)

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner satisfied the criterion relating to published articles about her and her work in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner satisfied the criterion relating to published articles about her and her work in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_06_B2203; source_row=45223
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, citing Bagamasbad for the proposition that advisory findings on unnecessary issues are not required.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, citing Bagamasbad for the proposition that advisory findings on unnecessary issues are not required.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_06_B2203; source_row=45225
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

high salary

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the high salary criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, making further analysis unnecessary to the outcome.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the high salary criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, making further analysis unnecessary to the outcome.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-25_03_B2203; source_row=45194
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评