AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination but conducted an aggregate review and found the record insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination but conducted an aggregate review and found the record insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
The Petitioner's proposed endeavor lacked a specific and consistent description—his initial filing described working as an architectural engineering manager building roads and bridges for U.S. companies, while his RFE response described running his own company installing aluminum and glass structures.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's proposed endeavor lacked a specific and consistent description—his initial filing described working as an architectural engineering manager building roads and bridges for U.S. companies, while his RFE response described running his own company installing aluminum and glass structures. The recommendation letters addressed past accomplishments rather than the prospective national impact of the endeavor, the expert opinion was inconsistent with the revised business plan, and the business plan projections lacked corroborating evidence.
advanced degree qualification (bachelor's + 5 years progressive experience)
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the academic evaluation and employment letters, considered in totality, established that the Petitioner more likely than not held a foreign equivalent of a bachelor's degree and had at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the academic evaluation and employment letters, considered in totality, established that the Petitioner more likely than not held a foreign equivalent of a bachelor's degree and had at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty at the time of filing.
meets three of six criteria (academic record, experience, licensure)
证据为何得到认可
The Director concluded, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner fulfilled the academic record, experience, and licensure criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A), (B), and (C).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director concluded, and AAO agreed, that the Petitioner fulfilled the academic record, experience, and licensure criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A), (B), and (C).