AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. The Petitioner had no experience in sales for solar power companies at the time of filing; his post-filing experience with a solar energy company could not establish eligibility at the time of filing; his experience letter lacked required duty descriptions; claimed solar specialist employment was undated and unsupported; and he lacked experience as an independent consultant as requ…
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. The Petitioner had no experience in sales for solar power companies at the time of filing; his post-filing experience with a solar energy company could not establish eligibility at the time of filing; his experience letter lacked required duty descriptions; claimed solar specialist employment was undated and unsupported; and he lacked experience as an independent consultant as required by his proposed endeavor.
The AAO declined to make a substantive finding, instead remanding for the Director to properly analyze the evidence to determine whether the record sufficiently describes the proposed endeavor and whether it has substantial merit and national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to make a substantive finding, instead remanding for the Director to properly analyze the evidence to determine whether the record sufficiently describes the proposed endeavor and whether it has substantial merit and national importance.
The AAO withdrew the Director's determination because the decision did not adequately address the submitted evidence, omitted relevant evidence, and did not sufficiently explain the basis for the denial. The matter is remanded for a complete analysis.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's determination because the decision did not adequately address the submitted evidence, omitted relevant evidence, and did not sufficiently explain the basis for the denial. The matter is remanded for a complete analysis.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
The AAO found the Director's determination was in error because the Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations or address the Petitioner's specific claims. The matter is remanded for proper evaluation.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the Director's determination was in error because the Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations or address the Petitioner's specific claims. The matter is remanded for proper evaluation.
Exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business
裁决如何说明
AAO treated the exceptional ability claim as waived because the Petitioner did not assert or submit evidence for it in response to the RFE and did not raise it on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO treated the exceptional ability claim as waived because the Petitioner did not assert or submit evidence for it in response to the RFE and did not raise it on appeal.
Post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty of the proposed endeavor
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the only evidence linking the Petitioner's law enforcement experience to logistics was his own personal statement and documents repeating his claims without independent corroboration. The work experience letter from his employer did not mention a specialization in traffic-related crimes or transportation.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the only evidence linking the Petitioner's law enforcement experience to logistics was his own personal statement and documents repeating his claims without independent corroboration. The work experience letter from his employer did not mention a specialization in traffic-related crimes or transportation. Even accepting the traffic-crime experience, he failed to show that specialty relates to operating a logistics and transportation business.
AAO found several unexplained discrepancies between the reference letters and resume that detracted from the quality and amount of her work experience, including her simultaneous full-time operation of a gas station and convenience store during the claimed consulting period, and inconsistent dates for client engagements.…
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found several unexplained discrepancies between the reference letters and resume that detracted from the quality and amount of her work experience, including her simultaneous full-time operation of a gas station and convenience store during the claimed consulting period, and inconsistent dates for client engagements. These discrepancies prevented her from establishing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
AAO did not reach prong 1 because the director had not addressed the merits; AAO remanded for the director to make the initial determination, while flagging that the petitioner must do more than identify a problem and state an intention to help solve it.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong 1 because the director had not addressed the merits; AAO remanded for the director to make the initial determination, while flagging that the petitioner must do more than identify a problem and state an intention to help solve it.
whether RFE response constituted material change to the proposed endeavor
证据为何得到认可
AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the more detailed RFE response materially changed the proposed endeavor; the second statement only supplied detail missing from the brief initial statement and did not contradict it, so it did not constitute an impermissible material change under Matter of Izummi.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the more detailed RFE response materially changed the proposed endeavor; the second statement only supplied detail missing from the brief initial statement and did not contradict it, so it did not constitute an impermissible material change under Matter of Izummi.