Commanding a salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the Petitioner's salary is determined by military rank and years of service, not by exceptional ability, and that comparison to entry-level or average salaries across all ranks is unpersuasive. A salary governed by a pay scale does not demonstrate exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's salary is determined by military rank and years of service, not by exceptional ability, and that comparison to entry-level or average salaries across all ranks is unpersuasive. A salary governed by a pay scale does not demonstrate exceptional ability.
official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the diploma's stated specialization (programming in automated systems and electronic computers) does not relate to the Petitioner's area of exceptional ability, professional sewing, and the additional certificates were not from colleges, universities, or institutions of learning.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the diploma's stated specialization (programming in automated systems and electronic computers) does not relate to the Petitioner's area of exceptional ability, professional sewing, and the additional certificates were not from colleges, universities, or institutions of learning.
Because the Petitioner did not meet three initial evidentiary criteria, AAO was not required to conduct a final merits determination. AAO noted it reviewed the record in aggregate and found it insufficient, and also noted the Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's final merits determination on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not meet three initial evidentiary criteria, AAO was not required to conduct a final merits determination. AAO noted it reviewed the record in aggregate and found it insufficient, and also noted the Petitioner did not specifically address the Director's final merits determination on appeal.
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner effectively conceded that the two documents submitted are not licenses or certifications for the practice of a particular profession or occupation, and did not contest the Director's basis for denial.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner effectively conceded that the two documents submitted are not licenses or certifications for the practice of a particular profession or occupation, and did not contest the Director's basis for denial.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The commendations and reference letters recognized the Petitioner for employer-specific services as a military police officer but did not demonstrate significant contributions to the broader security, military, or law enforcement field or the field encompassing his proposed endeavor. Letters praising broad impact were too vague to establish significant contributions beyond his specific employer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The commendations and reference letters recognized the Petitioner for employer-specific services as a military police officer but did not demonstrate significant contributions to the broader security, military, or law enforcement field or the field encompassing his proposed endeavor. Letters praising broad impact were too vague to establish significant contributions beyond his specific employer.
AAO found the Director's denial deficient because it ignored the Petitioner's credential evaluation and provided no explanation for why it was insufficient. AAO remanded for a new decision addressing this evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's denial deficient because it ignored the Petitioner's credential evaluation and provided no explanation for why it was insufficient. AAO remanded for a new decision addressing this evidence.
AAO found the Director's conclusions were bare and failed to explain the reasoning behind finding no substantial merit or national importance. AAO remanded for a properly reasoned decision.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's conclusions were bare and failed to explain the reasoning behind finding no substantial merit or national importance. AAO remanded for a properly reasoned decision.