The Petitioner failed to provide new evidence addressing the missing information required by the plain language of the regulation; instead, counsel merely summarized prior experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to provide new evidence addressing the missing information required by the plain language of the regulation; instead, counsel merely summarized prior experience.
Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO acknowledged the membership card and website screenshot in the record but held that the burden remains on the Petitioner, not the Director, to establish that AOPA is a 'professional' association under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The Petitioner did not show that AOPA's membership is comprised of individuals holding U.S. baccalaureate degrees or equivalents.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged the membership card and website screenshot in the record but held that the burden remains on the Petitioner, not the Director, to establish that AOPA is a 'professional' association under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The Petitioner did not show that AOPA's membership is comprised of individuals holding U.S. baccalaureate degrees or equivalents.
The certificates appear to represent only one or two days of training or conference attendance, the issuing organization was not established as an institution of learning, and the significance of the 'credits' received was not demonstrated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The certificates appear to represent only one or two days of training or conference attendance, the issuing organization was not established as an institution of learning, and the significance of the 'credits' received was not demonstrated.
The employment letter did not state that the Beneficiary was employed full-time, and the tenure of approximately five years as of the petition filing date fell well short of the required ten years.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment letter did not state that the Beneficiary was employed full-time, and the tenure of approximately five years as of the petition filing date fell well short of the required ten years.
AAO found the Petitioner confused 'certificate' with 'certification.' Training certificates for specific topics do not constitute a license or certification for the private security specialist occupation as a whole, so AAO withdrew the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner confused 'certificate' with 'certification.' Training certificates for specific topics do not constitute a license or certification for the private security specialist occupation as a whole, so AAO withdrew the Director's finding.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the Director's bare conclusion unsupported by any analysis. On de novo review, commendation for job performance does not constitute recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as a whole.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's bare conclusion unsupported by any analysis. On de novo review, commendation for job performance does not constitute recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as a whole.