leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the Petitioner served as co-captain of a university women's swimming and diving team with a distinguished reputation, and that USCIS policy permits considering leading roles within a division or department of an organization, contrary to the Director's narrower interpretation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner served as co-captain of a university women's swimming and diving team with a distinguished reputation, and that USCIS policy permits considering leading roles within a division or department of an organization, contrary to the Director's narrower interpretation.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the exhibitions were commercial in nature rather than artistic. The materials for one market described it as a commercial exhibition 'for the business of fashion' attended by buyers for boutiques and department stores, which does not satisfy the requirement that the event be artistic in nature.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the exhibitions were commercial in nature rather than artistic. The materials for one market described it as a commercial exhibition 'for the business of fashion' attended by buyers for boutiques and department stores, which does not satisfy the requirement that the event be artistic in nature.
AAO found the Petitioner has not established she is a performing artist, nor submitted the type of evidence specifically called for in the regulation (box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales). The accountant's letter did not suggest the income was earned as a performing artist.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner has not established she is a performing artist, nor submitted the type of evidence specifically called for in the regulation (box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales). The accountant's letter did not suggest the income was earned as a performing artist.
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the construction and infrastructure industries generally rather than his specific proposed endeavor. The record contained insufficient information about projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's specific work, and the evidence did not show his solutions or skills differed from those already available in the United States.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the construction and infrastructure industries generally rather than his specific proposed endeavor. The record contained insufficient information about projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's specific work, and the evidence did not show his solutions or skills differed from those already available in the United States.
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the document is identified as an 'identity card' with no demonstrated licensing requirements, and the Petitioner's claimed endeavor as an entrepreneur creating a music education tool does not require such a license, so the criterion is not satisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the document is identified as an 'identity card' with no demonstrated licensing requirements, and the Petitioner's claimed endeavor as an entrepreneur creating a music education tool does not require such a license, so the criterion is not satisfied.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the letters reflect personal regard and the potential of an unreleased product rather than recognition for actual achievements or significant contributions, and the lectures/workshops were promotional in nature, so the criterion is not satisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the letters reflect personal regard and the potential of an unreleased product rather than recognition for actual achievements or significant contributions, and the lectures/workshops were promotional in nature, so the criterion is not satisfied.