license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the evidence was not valid at the time of filing and that its relevance was not demonstrated, given that the Petitioner claims to have been employed in the profession from 2005 to 2015 without having had the identity card or registration. The new evidence on motion about the Councils did not explain this gap.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the evidence was not valid at the time of filing and that its relevance was not demonstrated, given that the Petitioner claims to have been employed in the profession from 2005 to 2015 without having had the identity card or registration. The new evidence on motion about the Councils did not explain this gap.
academic record relating to the area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the evaluation identifies courses in math, statistics, and accounting but only one course titled financial management, and does not list any specialty or concentration indicating a focus on financial management.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the evaluation identifies courses in math, statistics, and accounting but only one course titled financial management, and does not list any specialty or concentration indicating a focus on financial management.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the employment letters describe the Petitioner's title as 'administrator' performing 'administrative work' and do not establish ten years of full-time experience specifically in financial management.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the employment letters describe the Petitioner's title as 'administrator' performing 'administrative work' and do not establish ten years of full-time experience specifically in financial management.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the recommendation letters contained vague statements unsupported by evidence showing the work was noteworthy or constituted achievements/significant contributions to the field of photography above that ordinarily encountered.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the recommendation letters contained vague statements unsupported by evidence showing the work was noteworthy or constituted achievements/significant contributions to the field of photography above that ordinarily encountered.
AAO held that photography is not a 'profession' under section 101(a)(32) and that an FAA drone license is not a license for photography. A person can be a photographer without an FAA drone license; the license is for drone piloting, not photography.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that photography is not a 'profession' under section 101(a)(32) and that an FAA drone license is not a license for photography. A person can be a photographer without an FAA drone license; the license is for drone piloting, not photography.
AAO found unexplained inconsistencies between the claim of 40-50 hours/week photography work and the Petitioner's simultaneous full-time military career from 1985 to 2015. The Petitioner's own statement called the photography work 'extra activities,' suggesting it was a hobby or part-time. Less than 10 years had elapsed between 2015 retirement and the petition filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found unexplained inconsistencies between the claim of 40-50 hours/week photography work and the Petitioner's simultaneous full-time military career from 1985 to 2015. The Petitioner's own statement called the photography work 'extra activities,' suggesting it was a hobby or part-time. Less than 10 years had elapsed between 2015 retirement and the petition filing.
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, and AAO agreed that the selection process for IEEE does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, and AAO agreed that the selection process for IEEE does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the salary increase post-dated the petition filing and thus could not be considered; the actual W-2 salary of $118,355.78 fell below the high range in the comparative data; and the BLS occupational groups and project management specialist position did not represent proper bases for comparison to others performing similar services in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the salary increase post-dated the petition filing and thus could not be considered; the actual W-2 salary of $118,355.78 fell below the high range in the comparative data; and the BLS occupational groups and project management specialist position did not represent proper bases for comparison to others performing similar services in the field.