Only one employer letter (May 2012–April 2019) confirmed full-time employment, insufficient to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience as a pilot.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Only one employer letter (May 2012–April 2019) confirmed full-time employment, insufficient to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience as a pilot.
The record (resume, diploma, work letters, license, memberships) does not show he is well-positioned to advance his endeavor, particularly because he is not licensed to fly in the United States.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record (resume, diploma, work letters, license, memberships) does not show he is well-positioned to advance his endeavor, particularly because he is not licensed to fly in the United States.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The evidence addressed the importance of the HR industry generally and the Petitioner's personal qualifications rather than the specific prospective national impact of her proposed endeavor. Her plans and support letters did not show how her services would extend beyond individual client businesses to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The evidence addressed the importance of the HR industry generally and the Petitioner's personal qualifications rather than the specific prospective national impact of her proposed endeavor. Her plans and support letters did not show how her services would extend beyond individual client businesses to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly. Claimed job creation of 8 workers was unsupported by documentary evidence and insufficient to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects.
nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not discuss the criteria used to grant the award, did not explain why the award was nationally recognized, and submitted little evidence about El Tiempo's reputation or circulation. Mere receipt of a newspaper recognition is insufficient without further explanation and evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not discuss the criteria used to grant the award, did not explain why the award was nationally recognized, and submitted little evidence about El Tiempo's reputation or circulation. Mere receipt of a newspaper recognition is insufficient without further explanation and evidence.
published material about the noncitizen in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted insufficient evidence to establish that either article was published in major media: circulation data was unclear, outdated, or unverified. Additionally, the published material related to the Petitioner's work as an athlete, not as a coach, which is his stated field of endeavor for classification purposes.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted insufficient evidence to establish that either article was published in major media: circulation data was unclear, outdated, or unverified. Additionally, the published material related to the Petitioner's work as an athlete, not as a coach, which is his stated field of endeavor for classification purposes.
AAO concludes Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because she focused on the importance of the SCM/logistics industry rather than the prospective impact of her specific endeavor, and did not show substantial potential to employ U.S. workers or generate broader economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because she focused on the importance of the SCM/logistics industry rather than the prospective impact of her specific endeavor, and did not show substantial potential to employ U.S. workers or generate broader economic effects.