AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, finding that evidence primarily related to the general importance of entrepreneurship and technology rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, finding that evidence primarily related to the general importance of entrepreneurship and technology rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The company's tax returns showed modest and local operations, the licensing agreements were limited to a local Florida area, business plan projections were unsupported, and the endeavor did not show substantial positive economic effects at the regional or national level.
The AAO found that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor as a marketing director specializing in Brazilian travel did not demonstrate national importance because it would not extend sufficiently beyond her employer or clientele to impact the travel and tourism industry or U.S. economy at a national level.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor as a marketing director specializing in Brazilian travel did not demonstrate national importance because it would not extend sufficiently beyond her employer or clientele to impact the travel and tourism industry or U.S. economy at a national level. The AAO also found the Petitioner made an impermissible material change by introducing a new food business endeavor in the RFE reply, which could not be considered to retroactively establish eligibility.
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Evidence of roles in competitions and professional organizations pertained to whether the Petitioner is well-positioned (prong 2), not national importance. New evidence on appeal was substantially similar to existing evidence and did not cure the deficiency. A post-filing concert performance could not be considered.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Evidence of roles in competitions and professional organizations pertained to whether the Petitioner is well-positioned (prong 2), not national importance. New evidence on appeal was substantially similar to existing evidence and did not cure the deficiency. A post-filing concert performance could not be considered. Like the STEM teacher in Dhanasar itself, the Petitioner has not shown his endeavor would impact the field beyond his own students or event attendees.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employment letters fail to show ten years of full-time experience as a law professor. Some letters show part-time work, lack clear end dates, or describe non-teaching roles such as executive secretary and conciliator.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment letters fail to show ten years of full-time experience as a law professor. Some letters show part-time work, lack clear end dates, or describe non-teaching roles such as executive secretary and conciliator.
AAO does not reach a substantive conclusion on prong 1, instead remanding for the Director to reevaluate the proposed endeavor in light of potential material changes raised on appeal.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not reach a substantive conclusion on prong 1, instead remanding for the Director to reevaluate the proposed endeavor in light of potential material changes raised on appeal.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agrees that recommendation letters and certificates of recognition show appreciation from local employers and communities but do not establish industry- or field-level recognition for achievements and significant contributions. AAO remands consideration of additional conference and article evidence the Director did not previously review.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees that recommendation letters and certificates of recognition show appreciation from local employers and communities but do not establish industry- or field-level recognition for achievements and significant contributions. AAO remands consideration of additional conference and article evidence the Director did not previously review.
The Petitioner asserted on appeal that the Director did not consider this criterion and submitted membership evidence. AAO remands for the Director's consideration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner asserted on appeal that the Director did not consider this criterion and submitted membership evidence. AAO remands for the Director's consideration.
license or certification to practice the occupation
裁决如何说明
Petitioner submitted on appeal new evidence of her registration as a lawyer in Brazil and bar admission requirements. AAO remands so the Director can consider this evidence in the first instance.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner submitted on appeal new evidence of her registration as a lawyer in Brazil and bar admission requirements. AAO remands so the Director can consider this evidence in the first instance.