The record does not show that a press pass or letter is required to perform the duties of an entrepreneurial producer and director, nor that press credentials are mandatory for journalists.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record does not show that a press pass or letter is required to perform the duties of an entrepreneurial producer and director, nor that press credentials are mandatory for journalists.
The record lacks evidence of completion of the program, lacks evidence of the entities' status as institutes of learning, and the certifications/programs do not relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability as an entrepreneurial producer and director.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacks evidence of completion of the program, lacks evidence of the entities' status as institutes of learning, and the certifications/programs do not relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability as an entrepreneurial producer and director.
AAO noted that how well-positioned the petitioner is to advance her endeavor is a second-prong consideration, but found no new supporting evidence was offered on motion.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that how well-positioned the petitioner is to advance her endeavor is a second-prong consideration, but found no new supporting evidence was offered on motion.
AAO found the Petitioner's recitation of personal qualities and references to prior evidence did not constitute new facts supported by evidence sufficient to overcome the prior dismissal on this prong.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's recitation of personal qualities and references to prior evidence did not constitute new facts supported by evidence sufficient to overcome the prior dismissal on this prong.
Most submitted articles mention the Petitioner only briefly, providing name and title but not including substantial discussion of his work. The biographical profile printout was not established as a professional or major trade publication. The most substantive article lacks author credit and has an apparently promotional tone consistent with a press release, making it unable to meet the regulatory requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Most submitted articles mention the Petitioner only briefly, providing name and title but not including substantial discussion of his work. The biographical profile printout was not established as a professional or major trade publication. The most substantive article lacks author credit and has an apparently promotional tone consistent with a press release, making it unable to meet the regulatory requirements.
AAO reserved discussion of this criterion because it was the only criterion met and detailed discussion could not change the outcome of the appeal, as the Petitioner still falls short of the required three criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved discussion of this criterion because it was the only criterion met and detailed discussion could not change the outcome of the appeal, as the Petitioner still falls short of the required three criteria.