可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9021–9030

EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner's background in trade and diplomacy, media coverage, testimonials from senior government officials, publications, and employer description collectively establish sustained national and international acclaim at the top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner's background in trade and diplomacy, media coverage, testimonials from senior government officials, publications, and employer description collectively establish sustained national and international acclaim at the top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B2203; source_row=31065
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or remuneration for services

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the petitioner's earnings of $494,749 were more than three times the Level IV economist's prevailing wage for his geographical area in 2020, concluding his salary was high relative to others in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's earnings of $494,749 were more than three times the Level IV economist's prevailing wage for his geographical area in 2020, concluding his salary was high relative to others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B2203; source_row=31064
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that IEEE publications qualify as professional publications within the Beneficiary's subfield of AI and robotics, meeting the basic parameters of the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that IEEE publications qualify as professional publications within the Beneficiary's subfield of AI and robotics, meeting the basic parameters of the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31072
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted the awards were primarily for innovation/entrepreneurship rather than excellence in the AI/robotics field specifically.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted the awards were primarily for innovation/entrepreneurship rather than excellence in the AI/robotics field specifically.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the Beneficiary is a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements, so AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the Beneficiary is a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31069
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major media

裁决如何说明

Once three criteria were met, AAO found it unnecessary to address additional eligibility claims under (iii).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Once three criteria were met, AAO found it unnecessary to address additional eligibility claims under (iii).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31070
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

performing a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the leading or critical role criterion was satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the leading or critical role criterion was satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31073
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能经理博士128 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

Once three criteria were met, AAO found it unnecessary to address additional eligibility claims under (v).

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Once three criteria were met, AAO found it unnecessary to address additional eligibility claims under (v).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31071
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

Willful misrepresentation by the Beneficiary

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO acknowledged that inconsistencies remained unresolved but concluded that the evidence did not establish whether the Beneficiary willfully misrepresented her qualifications or merely carelessly listed inaccurate dates and hours. AAO also withdrew the Director's finding on employment-date inconsistencies that were not alleged in the NOIR.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged that inconsistencies remained unresolved but concluded that the evidence did not establish whether the Beneficiary willfully misrepresented her qualifications or merely carelessly listed inaccurate dates and hours. AAO also withdrew the Director's finding on employment-date inconsistencies that were not alleged in the NOIR.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B5203; source_row=31067
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

Willful misrepresentation by the Petitioner

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found no evidence that the Petitioner knew the Beneficiary's credentials were false, and further noted that the NOIR did not allege any misrepresentations by the Petitioner at all — only by the Beneficiary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found no evidence that the Petitioner knew the Beneficiary's credentials were false, and further noted that the NOIR did not allege any misrepresentations by the Petitioner at all — only by the Beneficiary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B5203; source_row=31066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评