可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9041–9050

EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他教授

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary threshold, though noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary threshold, though noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_04_B2203; source_row=31054
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence related to the importance of industries and professions broadly rather than her specific proposed endeavor, the business plan was filed years after the petition and was also inconsistent with her personal statement, and the expert opinion did not adequately explain how U.S. business involvement in Brazil and Latin America would have prospective national impact.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence related to the importance of industries and professions broadly rather than her specific proposed endeavor, the business plan was filed years after the petition and was also inconsistent with her personal statement, and the expert opinion did not adequately explain how U.S. business involvement in Brazil and Latin America would have prospective national impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=31031
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=31033
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to address the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to address the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_01_B5203; source_row=31032
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that criterion viii was satisfied; this was not disputed on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that criterion viii was satisfied; this was not disputed on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31048
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the aggregate that the record did not support extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the aggregate that the record did not support extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31049
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Reference letters detailed the Petitioner's value to individual employers and clients but did not demonstrate the originality of her work or that her strategies and methods had significantly impacted the field as a whole, such as through widespread implementation by others in the field.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Reference letters detailed the Petitioner's value to individual employers and clients but did not demonstrate the originality of her work or that her strategies and methods had significantly impacted the field as a whole, such as through widespread implementation by others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31045
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that criterion vi was satisfied; this was not disputed on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that criterion vi was satisfied; this was not disputed on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31047
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree qualification

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the Petitioner's degree, transcript, and employment history together satisfy the advanced degree requirement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's degree, transcript, and employment history together satisfy the advanced degree requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_02_B5203; source_row=31040
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the awards criterion because the Petitioner failed three other criteria and could not numerically meet the three-criteria threshold, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the awards criterion because the Petitioner failed three other criteria and could not numerically meet the three-criteria threshold, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_02_B2203; source_row=31037
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评