AAO found that detailed expert letters and a 2019 Physics of Fluids article authored by NASA and Sandia scientists demonstrated the significance and impact of the Petitioner's DSMC computational geometry engine and modules, which were incorporated into NASA simulation tools.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that detailed expert letters and a 2019 Physics of Fluids article authored by NASA and Sandia scientists demonstrated the significance and impact of the Petitioner's DSMC computational geometry engine and modules, which were incorporated into NASA simulation tools.
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish broader implications beyond the clients served; HUBZone location was not specifically identified; and the projections of 40 employees and $3 million revenue lacked supporting detail and were not significant enough to rise to national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish broader implications beyond the clients served; HUBZone location was not specifically identified; and the projections of 40 employees and $3 million revenue lacked supporting detail and were not significant enough to rise to national importance.
AAO found her degree in tourism and hotel management unrelated to a marketing-strategy endeavor, her marketing experience poorly documented (with employment dates inconsistent with a supervisor's letter), and client letters focused on travel planning rather than marketing.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found her degree in tourism and hotel management unrelated to a marketing-strategy endeavor, her marketing experience poorly documented (with employment dates inconsistent with a supervisor's letter), and client letters focused on travel planning rather than marketing.
The Petitioner's salary was above the range shown but the salary screenshots combined levels 1, 2, and 3 technicians, skewing figures lower. Without level 2 and level 3 technician salary data separately, the Petitioner could not demonstrate a salary commensurate with exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's salary was above the range shown but the salary screenshots combined levels 1, 2, and 3 technicians, skewing figures lower. Without level 2 and level 3 technician salary data separately, the Petitioner could not demonstrate a salary commensurate with exceptional ability.
The Petitioner did not establish that his union membership qualified as membership in a 'professional' association. The record did not show the organization had a membership body requiring a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that his union membership qualified as membership in a 'professional' association. The record did not show the organization had a membership body requiring a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent.