可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9251–9260

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputations

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found that letters of endorsement from employers and colleagues—attesting to contributions to successful ad campaigns, development of a breakthrough marketing tool, and winning major new accounts—demonstrated the Beneficiary made a significant impact on organizations with distinguished reputations in advertising and technology, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that letters of endorsement from employers and colleagues—attesting to contributions to successful ad campaigns, development of a breakthrough marketing tool, and winning major new accounts—demonstrated the Beneficiary made a significant impact on organizations with distinguished reputations in advertising and technology, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_02_B2203; source_row=30713
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

裁决如何说明

Although uncontested on appeal, AAO directed the Director to review the evidence submitted in support of this criterion on remand because the denial similarly failed to analyze the totality of the evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although uncontested on appeal, AAO directed the Director to review the evidence submitted in support of this criterion on remand because the denial similarly failed to analyze the totality of the evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and incomplete, failing to acknowledge documentation regarding circulation. AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the criterion was met at the time of filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and incomplete, failing to acknowledge documentation regarding circulation. AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the criterion was met at the time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director failed to address initial evidence and one of the Petitioner's membership claims, and remanded for re-examination of the evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director failed to address initial evidence and one of the Petitioner's membership claims, and remanded for re-examination of the evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30697
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director made a conclusory determination without addressing the Petitioner's activities with one of the claimed organizations, and remanded for review based on the totality of evidence.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director made a conclusory determination without addressing the Petitioner's activities with one of the claimed organizations, and remanded for review based on the totality of evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30699
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO agreed it was difficult to discern what specific evidence the Director considered, and remanded for re-examination of the Petitioner's claims and all supporting evidence.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed it was difficult to discern what specific evidence the Director considered, and remanded for re-examination of the Petitioner's claims and all supporting evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical roles

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director failed to address the primary claim and the supporting evidence regarding the organizations' distinguished reputations, and remanded for re-examination.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director failed to address the primary claim and the supporting evidence regarding the organizations' distinguished reputations, and remanded for re-examination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Initial evidence — at least three of six criteria

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met three of the six evidentiary criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met three of the six evidentiary criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_03_B5203; source_row=30716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 最终综合评估申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination — degree of expertise significantly above ordinary

裁决如何说明

Because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's specific final merits findings on appeal, AAO deemed those findings waived and affirmed the denial on that basis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's specific final merits findings on appeal, AAO deemed those findings waived and affirmed the denial on that basis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_03_B5203; source_row=30717
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive failures on the first and second prongs rendered further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive failures on the first and second prongs rendered further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_04_B5203; source_row=30731
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评