member of the professions holding an advanced degree
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that physical fitness trainer is not a listed profession under the Act and the Petitioner did not show a baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement, nor did he submit evidence of an advanced degree or qualifying progressive experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that physical fitness trainer is not a listed profession under the Act and the Petitioner did not show a baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement, nor did he submit evidence of an advanced degree or qualifying progressive experience.
AAO found substantial merit shown but national importance not established. Generalizations about the accounting profession do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor would have broader implications, and the Petitioner's claims about the energy industry connection were unsupported by documentary evidence.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found substantial merit shown but national importance not established. Generalizations about the accounting profession do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor would have broader implications, and the Petitioner's claims about the energy industry connection were unsupported by documentary evidence.
Director's discretion to deny without first issuing an RFE or NOID
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the Director erred in declining to issue an RFE, particularly because she identified no additional evidence or explanation that could have established eligibility.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the Director erred in declining to issue an RFE, particularly because she identified no additional evidence or explanation that could have established eligibility.
New facts supported by documentary evidence establishing eligibility
AAO 为什么未被说服
The award the Petitioner claims was won after the petition filing date and therefore cannot establish eligibility. Furthermore, the award criterion had already been found satisfied in the prior appeal decision, so even if the post-filing award could count, it would not affect the outcome.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The award the Petitioner claims was won after the petition filing date and therefore cannot establish eligibility. Furthermore, the award criterion had already been found satisfied in the prior appeal decision, so even if the post-filing award could count, it would not affect the outcome.
Lozada requirements for ineffective assistance of counsel
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted an affidavit but failed to provide evidence that former counsel was notified of the ineffective-assistance allegation and given an opportunity to respond, and failed to provide evidence of a disciplinary complaint or an explanation for the absence of one. The Ninth Circuit cases cited to support waiving these requirements are not binding in Florida.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted an affidavit but failed to provide evidence that former counsel was notified of the ineffective-assistance allegation and given an opportunity to respond, and failed to provide evidence of a disciplinary complaint or an explanation for the absence of one. The Ninth Circuit cases cited to support waiving these requirements are not binding in Florida.
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach this issue.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach this issue.