可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9421–9430

EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not pursue this claim in his response to the RFE, and AAO did not address it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not pursue this claim in his response to the RFE, and AAO did not address it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=30467
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The Director found and AAO accepted that the Petitioner submitted evidence of participation as a judge of others in the field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found and AAO accepted that the Petitioner submitted evidence of participation as a judge of others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=30469
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or remuneration

证据为何得到认可

The Director found and AAO accepted that the Petitioner submitted evidence that he commanded a high salary in relation to others in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found and AAO accepted that the Petitioner submitted evidence that he commanded a high salary in relation to others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-23_01_B2203; source_row=30472
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程经理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification

裁决如何说明

AAO declines to reach prong three because the prong-one failure is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach prong three because the prong-one failure is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-23_01_B5203; source_row=30476
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程经理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declines to reach prong two because the prong-one failure is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach prong two because the prong-one failure is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-23_01_B5203; source_row=30475
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the Petitioner had not shown his endeavor would extend beyond his company and its customers to impact the frozen dessert industry or the U.S. economy broadly. The record lacked business records, bank statements, or real estate investment proposals demonstrating current investment levels or funding for the proposed factories, and the projections standing alone were insufficient to establish national importance.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner had not shown his endeavor would extend beyond his company and its customers to impact the frozen dessert industry or the U.S. economy broadly. The record lacked business records, bank statements, or real estate investment proposals demonstrating current investment levels or funding for the proposed factories, and the projections standing alone were insufficient to establish national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=30461
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent degree qualification (single degree rule)

AAO 为什么未被说服

All three credential evaluators agree that the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree alone is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. Because the regulations require a single foreign degree equivalent to at least a U.S. baccalaureate as a predicate for an advanced degree finding, and that predicate is not met, the foreign master's degree cannot qualify as an 'advanced degree' under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
All three credential evaluators agree that the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree alone is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. Because the regulations require a single foreign degree equivalent to at least a U.S. baccalaureate as a predicate for an advanced degree finding, and that predicate is not met, the foreign master's degree cannot qualify as an 'advanced degree' under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The evaluations are also contradictory and lack a credible analytical roadmap. The Petitioner further failed to show five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience to qualify under the alternative pathway.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-22_02_B5203; source_row=30464
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets minimum educational requirement of labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The plain language of the labor certification requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent, and USCIS may neither ignore nor supplement that certification term. The Beneficiary's credentials do not meet this requirement for the same reasons they do not satisfy the advanced degree definition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The plain language of the labor certification requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent, and USCIS may neither ignore nor supplement that certification term. The Beneficiary's credentials do not meet this requirement for the same reasons they do not satisfy the advanced degree definition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-22_02_B5203; source_row=30465
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他119 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and failed to engage with citation evidence (including 119 citations for one key article) and detailed reference letters from field professors. AAO concluded the Petitioner's work did significantly impact the field and that original contributions of major significance were established.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and failed to engage with citation evidence (including 119 citations for one key article) and detailed reference letters from field professors. AAO concluded the Petitioner's work did significantly impact the field and that original contributions of major significance were established.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=30458
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他119 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=30457
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评