可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9461–9470

NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the Dhanasar prongs because Petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the Dhanasar prongs because Petitioner did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-16_02_B5203; source_row=30429
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the school certificate listed physical training (Greek Roman wrestling) among courses, the certificate received was for general education. The U.S. high school diploma similarly does not indicate it relates to wrestling.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the school certificate listed physical training (Greek Roman wrestling) among courses, the certificate received was for general education. The U.S. high school diploma similarly does not indicate it relates to wrestling.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-16_02_B5203; source_row=30424
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration for services

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the Director erroneously treated monthly figures as annual, the AAO nonetheless agreed the evidence was insufficient. The invoices were incomplete, inconsistent with the employer's letter, and reflected irregular per-project payments; the comparative salary figures related only to fixed monthly salaries rather than variable per-project compensation; and the mobile app developer payments were made to the Petitioner'…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Director erroneously treated monthly figures as annual, the AAO nonetheless agreed the evidence was insufficient. The invoices were incomplete, inconsistent with the employer's letter, and reflected irregular per-project payments; the comparative salary figures related only to fixed monthly salaries rather than variable per-project compensation; and the mobile app developer payments were made to the Petitioner's agency, not established as the Petitioner's own remuneration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=30409
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the comparable evidence exception applies, as she did not submit statements from the awarding entities confirming that awards are only given to organizations and not individuals, nor evidence that the awards constituted recognition of her individual excellence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the comparable evidence exception applies, as she did not submit statements from the awarding entities confirming that awards are only given to organizations and not individuals, nor evidence that the awards constituted recognition of her individual excellence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=30406
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The submitted articles were about events the Petitioner organized, not about the Petitioner herself relating to her PR work. Articles that do not identify the Petitioner do not satisfy the regulation, and none of the submitted materials include a substantial discussion of the Petitioner's PR work as required by USCIS Policy Manual guidance.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted articles were about events the Petitioner organized, not about the Petitioner herself relating to her PR work. Articles that do not identify the Petitioner do not satisfy the regulation, and none of the submitted materials include a substantial discussion of the Petitioner's PR work as required by USCIS Policy Manual guidance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=30408
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO declined to consider a new RASO website printout submitted on appeal because the Petitioner had failed to submit it in response to the RFE. Furthermore, the printout itself does not describe any outstanding achievements requirement — it only requires filing an application with two recommendations and a video message — undermining the RASO officials' letters claiming stricter requirements.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to consider a new RASO website printout submitted on appeal because the Petitioner had failed to submit it in response to the RFE. Furthermore, the printout itself does not describe any outstanding achievements requirement — it only requires filing an application with two recommendations and a video message — undermining the RASO officials' letters claiming stricter requirements.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=30407
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the Petitioner's experience, expertise, publications, citation record, and progress in his field position him well to advance his proposed endeavor.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's experience, expertise, publications, citation record, and progress in his field position him well to advance his proposed endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=30414
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the research has substantial merit and national importance because of its contributions to understanding cognitive processes of word recognition, development of reading comprehension assessments, and dissemination of results to the broader field.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the research has substantial merit and national importance because of its contributions to understanding cognitive processes of word recognition, development of reading comprehension assessments, and dissemination of results to the broader field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=30413
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements

证据为何得到认可

AAO concluded that based on the Petitioner's track record and the significance of his work to U.S. education interests, his contributions are valuable enough that on balance they would benefit the U.S. even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that based on the Petitioner's track record and the significance of his work to U.S. education interests, his contributions are valuable enough that on balance they would benefit the U.S. even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=30415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO did not formally conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step 1. It noted in advisory fashion that the record in the aggregate does not show the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not formally conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step 1. It noted in advisory fashion that the record in the aggregate does not show the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=30412
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评