The Petitioner did not provide an academic evaluation to establish his Philippine bachelor's degree was equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree. Additionally, even assuming equivalency, he could not have accumulated the required five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience by the filing date, given his degree was conferred in March 2014 and the petition was filed in October 2018.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide an academic evaluation to establish his Philippine bachelor's degree was equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree. Additionally, even assuming equivalency, he could not have accumulated the required five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience by the filing date, given his degree was conferred in March 2014 and the petition was filed in October 2018.
foreign equivalent of U.S. bachelor's degree (advanced degree professional)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO holds the original unsigned evaluation lacked credibility and analytical support, and the new evaluation submitted on motion is similarly conclusory, fails to identify the evaluator or documents reviewed, and equates the foreign degree only to a Canadian bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO holds the original unsigned evaluation lacked credibility and analytical support, and the new evaluation submitted on motion is similarly conclusory, fails to identify the evaluator or documents reviewed, and equates the foreign degree only to a Canadian bachelor's degree.
AAO did not reach the Dhanasar prongs because the Petitioner failed to establish threshold EB-2 eligibility as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the Dhanasar prongs because the Petitioner failed to establish threshold EB-2 eligibility as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
AAO treats exceptional-ability eligibility as waived on motion because the petitioner did not challenge the prior decision's adverse determination on that issue.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO treats exceptional-ability eligibility as waived on motion because the petitioner did not challenge the prior decision's adverse determination on that issue.
The Petitioner did not pursue his initial claim under this criterion on appeal and did not contest the Director's determination, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not pursue his initial claim under this criterion on appeal and did not contest the Director's determination, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
AAO found that publication in highly ranked journals does not alone demonstrate major significance, aggregate citation figures do not identify which specific contributions are majorly significant, Altmetric scores reflect social media attention rather than scientific impact, Dimensions above-average rankings do not equate to top-of-field significance, and recommendation letters were too conclusory and failed to articulate h…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that publication in highly ranked journals does not alone demonstrate major significance, aggregate citation figures do not identify which specific contributions are majorly significant, Altmetric scores reflect social media attention rather than scientific impact, Dimensions above-average rankings do not equate to top-of-field significance, and recommendation letters were too conclusory and failed to articulate how the Petitioner's work influenced the field.
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although AAO had already determined prong two was not met, it briefly addressed prong three: the Petitioner's reference letter on impracticality of labor certification was conclusory and unsupported; the record did not show her contributions rose to a level overcoming the national interest in protecting domestic labor; and her education and skills (already found insufficient under prong two) also failed to show benefit to t…
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although AAO had already determined prong two was not met, it briefly addressed prong three: the Petitioner's reference letter on impracticality of labor certification was conclusory and unsupported; the record did not show her contributions rose to a level overcoming the national interest in protecting domestic labor; and her education and skills (already found insufficient under prong two) also failed to show benefit to the U.S. warranting a waiver.
While AAO disagreed with the Director's material-change finding and withdrew that portion of his decision, AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success. Reference letters were largely conclusory or lacked specificity; her prior work in Brazil related to a surgical case study and poster in nutrition rather than liver transplantation research; unpublished research does not show field recognition; a…
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While AAO disagreed with the Director's material-change finding and withdrew that portion of his decision, AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a record of success. Reference letters were largely conclusory or lacked specificity; her prior work in Brazil related to a surgical case study and poster in nutrition rather than liver transplantation research; unpublished research does not show field recognition; and poster presentations alone are standard duties of a medical scientist, not indicators of success.