AAO affirmed its prior dismissal finding that the Petitioner's admissions and marketing work for a single university did not demonstrate national importance under Dhanasar. The STEM OPT press release was inapplicable because the Petitioner failed to show his proposed endeavor involved business analytics or financial analytics.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed its prior dismissal finding that the Petitioner's admissions and marketing work for a single university did not demonstrate national importance under Dhanasar. The STEM OPT press release was inapplicable because the Petitioner failed to show his proposed endeavor involved business analytics or financial analytics. New claims about his personal business were either not previously presented (and thus improperly raised on motion) or substantively identical to the prior endeavor, and still did not show broad national impact.
license to practice the profession or certification
裁决如何说明
AAO noted that the Petitioner never claimed this criterion and the Director failed to explain why it was found met, directing the Director to reassess it on remand.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the Petitioner never claimed this criterion and the Director failed to explain why it was found met, directing the Director to reassess it on remand.
AAO did not directly address this criterion but remanded for the Director to review Petitioner's appeal arguments and decide whether additional criteria are fulfilled.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not directly address this criterion but remanded for the Director to review Petitioner's appeal arguments and decide whether additional criteria are fulfilled.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
裁决如何说明
AAO did not directly address this criterion but directed the Director on remand to review arguments on appeal and decide whether any additional criteria are fulfilled.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not directly address this criterion but directed the Director on remand to review arguments on appeal and decide whether any additional criteria are fulfilled.