AAO found the Director's denial lacked proper analysis and explanation, and remanded for a thorough re-evaluation of the evidence as it stood at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's denial lacked proper analysis and explanation, and remanded for a thorough re-evaluation of the evidence as it stood at the time of filing.
Although the Director found prong two met, AAO noted the decision failed to identify the supporting evidence or adequately explain the determination, and remanded for a proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Director found prong two met, AAO noted the decision failed to identify the supporting evidence or adequately explain the determination, and remanded for a proper analysis.
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director's evaluation of prong three was in error because it did not adequately address the Petitioner's arguments and evidence or properly weigh the balancing factors under Dhanasar, and remanded for proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's evaluation of prong three was in error because it did not adequately address the Petitioner's arguments and evidence or properly weigh the balancing factors under Dhanasar, and remanded for proper analysis.
advanced degree qualification (baccalaureate + 5 years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employment and career certificates document less than five years of experience and lack duty descriptions; the recommendation letter also lacks duty specifics and references pre-baccalaureate employment; the curriculum vitae is self-serving without independent documentary support.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment and career certificates document less than five years of experience and lack duty descriptions; the recommendation letter also lacks duty specifics and references pre-baccalaureate employment; the curriculum vitae is self-serving without independent documentary support.
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's findings on national importance, adding that the Petitioner's letters were generalized and conclusory, the advisory opinion improperly focused on the importance of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor, and the Petitioner's claimed unique methodologies lacked sufficient explanation.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's findings on national importance, adding that the Petitioner's letters were generalized and conclusory, the advisory opinion improperly focused on the importance of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor, and the Petitioner's claimed unique methodologies lacked sufficient explanation. The Petitioner also failed to identify a specific and consistent proposed endeavor, further precluding a finding of national importance.
Advanced degree or equivalent (5 years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found material inconsistencies between the employment letters (which stated full-time work) and the Petitioner's own ETA declaration (which stated part-time work at the same periods), rendering the evidence of five years of progressive experience unreliable and insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found material inconsistencies between the employment letters (which stated full-time work) and the Petitioner's own ETA declaration (which stated part-time work at the same periods), rendering the evidence of five years of progressive experience unreliable and insufficient.
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's reliance on his qualifications, the general importance of the STEM/industrial-maintenance field, and unsubstantiated business projections does not establish that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance. The advisory opinion conflated importance of the field with importance of the specific endeavor.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's reliance on his qualifications, the general importance of the STEM/industrial-maintenance field, and unsubstantiated business projections does not establish that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance. The advisory opinion conflated importance of the field with importance of the specific endeavor.