可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 9701–9710

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

Authorship of scholarly articles

裁决如何说明

AAO deemed the issue waived because the Petitioner did not pursue this criterion on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO deemed the issue waived because the Petitioner did not pursue this criterion on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_02_B2203; source_row=30076
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

Original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO agreed the Director arbitrarily dismissed expert letters and ignored documentary evidence, and remanded for proper evaluation.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Director arbitrarily dismissed expert letters and ignored documentary evidence, and remanded for proper evaluation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_02_B2203; source_row=30075
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

Published material about the individual

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's denial conclusory and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's appellate arguments.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's denial conclusory and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's appellate arguments.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_02_B2203; source_row=30074
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director failed to consider much of the evidence and remanded for a full re-examination of all submitted claims and evidence.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director failed to consider much of the evidence and remanded for a full re-examination of all submitted claims and evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30069
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate and conclusory, noting the Director's discussion mirrored the RFE language despite additional evidence having been submitted, and remanded for a full analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate and conclusory, noting the Director's discussion mirrored the RFE language despite additional evidence having been submitted, and remanded for a full analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30065
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's analysis conclusory, failing to engage with specific evidence, and remanded with instructions to re-examine including accompanying explanatory letters.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis conclusory, failing to engage with specific evidence, and remanded with instructions to re-examine including accompanying explanatory letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the Director failed entirely to evaluate this criterion despite the Petitioner's claim and supporting evidence, and remanded with instructions to review the record including supplemental appeal evidence.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Director failed entirely to evaluate this criterion despite the Petitioner's claim and supporting evidence, and remanded with instructions to review the record including supplemental appeal evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or other significantly high remuneration

裁决如何说明

AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted her claimed occupation as an entrepreneur, and noted the Director's analysis again mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence in the RFE response. The matter was remanded for re-examination.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted her claimed occupation as an entrepreneur, and noted the Director's analysis again mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence in the RFE response. The matter was remanded for re-examination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30071
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程工程师

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding of national importance, concluding that the documentation predominantly related to past research activities rather than future plans, that recommendation letters demonstrated little knowledge of the Petitioner's work since he left academia, and that the record lacked sufficient evidence establishing a direct connection between the Petitioner's prospective research and the broader national…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding of national importance, concluding that the documentation predominantly related to past research activities rather than future plans, that recommendation letters demonstrated little knowledge of the Petitioner's work since he left academia, and that the record lacked sufficient evidence establishing a direct connection between the Petitioner's prospective research and the broader national implications claimed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-21_01_B5203; source_row=30059
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理博士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately address prong two on the merits; the matter was remanded for the Director to reconsider the full record under all three prongs.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong two on the merits; the matter was remanded for the Director to reconsider the full record under all three prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-21_02_B5203; source_row=30063
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评