The credential evaluator failed to provide sufficient analysis of credit hours and did not explain how the 'lato sensu' specialization equals a U.S. master's degree. The AACRAO EDGE database confirmed only a bachelor's-level equivalency. The employment letter did not demonstrate progressive duties or experience in the same specialty as the bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The credential evaluator failed to provide sufficient analysis of credit hours and did not explain how the 'lato sensu' specialization equals a U.S. master's degree. The AACRAO EDGE database confirmed only a bachelor's-level equivalency. The employment letter did not demonstrate progressive duties or experience in the same specialty as the bachelor's degree.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found unresolved inconsistencies between the certificates and other record evidence regarding the awards received, insufficient evidence that the awards are recognized in the overall martial arts field nationally or internationally (as all awards were at events sanctioned by one association), and a lack of media or field-wide recognition of the awards.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found unresolved inconsistencies between the certificates and other record evidence regarding the awards received, insufficient evidence that the awards are recognized in the overall martial arts field nationally or internationally (as all awards were at events sanctioned by one association), and a lack of media or field-wide recognition of the awards.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that while membership on a national team may qualify, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence about the selection process or criteria demonstrating that outstanding achievements are required of members.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that while membership on a national team may qualify, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence about the selection process or criteria demonstrating that outstanding achievements are required of members.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concurred with the Director because the Petitioner failed to challenge the finding that the article was not about him, and provided no evidence of the publication's circulation or standing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concurred with the Director because the Petitioner failed to challenge the finding that the article was not about him, and provided no evidence of the publication's circulation or standing.
AAO confirmed that petitioner's counsel expressly stated the Petitioner was not applying under the three-of-ten criteria test, so review was limited to the one-time achievement pathway.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed that petitioner's counsel expressly stated the Petitioner was not applying under the three-of-ten criteria test, so review was limited to the one-time achievement pathway.
at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employment letter did not confirm full-time status, and contained material inconsistencies with the Petitioner's résumé regarding her role during 2005–2008 that the Petitioner failed to resolve.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment letter did not confirm full-time status, and contained material inconsistencies with the Petitioner's résumé regarding her role during 2005–2008 that the Petitioner failed to resolve.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
Letters and evidence showed the Petitioner was a valued employee but demonstrated only internal company recognition, not recognition for contributions to the broader industry or field. General industry articles did not mention the Petitioner or her impact on the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters and evidence showed the Petitioner was a valued employee but demonstrated only internal company recognition, not recognition for contributions to the broader industry or field. General industry articles did not mention the Petitioner or her impact on the field.
official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the Petitioner completed education equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, her degree was in law/legal and social sciences, not in the proposed area of exceptional ability (human resources management). Therefore the degree is not sufficiently related.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner completed education equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, her degree was in law/legal and social sciences, not in the proposed area of exceptional ability (human resources management). Therefore the degree is not sufficiently related.