license to practice the profession or certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's Brazilian Bar Association membership was canceled in June 2018, before the I-140 petition was filed. Additionally, the Petitioner did not show that a license or certification is required to practice human resources management.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's Brazilian Bar Association membership was canceled in June 2018, before the I-140 petition was filed. Additionally, the Petitioner did not show that a license or certification is required to practice human resources management.
original contributions of major significance in the field
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy at least three criteria regardless, making analysis of a fourth criterion unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy at least three criteria regardless, making analysis of a fourth criterion unnecessary.
official academic record relating to the area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination because the Petitioner had not sufficiently documented what her area of exceptional ability actually is, making it impossible to confirm that her program of study relates to it.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination because the Petitioner had not sufficiently documented what her area of exceptional ability actually is, making it impossible to confirm that her program of study relates to it.
license or certification for the profession or occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner invoked the comparable-evidence provision but failed to identify specific evidence and, more fundamentally, had not established what her occupation is, so she could not explain why the standard requirements do not readily apply.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner invoked the comparable-evidence provision but failed to identify specific evidence and, more fundamentally, had not established what her occupation is, so she could not explain why the standard requirements do not readily apply.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner impermissibly changed the substantive nature of his proposed endeavor after filing, adding plans to expand S- and market COVID-19 kiosks that were not part of the original petition. Even assuming the revised plan were considered, the Petitioner failed to show that the endeavor's prospective impact rises to the level of national importance beyond his business and its clientele.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner impermissibly changed the substantive nature of his proposed endeavor after filing, adding plans to expand S- and market COVID-19 kiosks that were not part of the original petition. Even assuming the revised plan were considered, the Petitioner failed to show that the endeavor's prospective impact rises to the level of national importance beyond his business and its clientele.
AAO found the evidence established at most localized business-level impacts rather than national importance. The expert opinion letter lacked corroboration and merely restated the Petitioner's claims. Letters of recommendation cited company-specific results without establishing a causal link or national scope. The Petitioner did not show his techniques were unique, innovative, or new to the field.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the evidence established at most localized business-level impacts rather than national importance. The expert opinion letter lacked corroboration and merely restated the Petitioner's claims. Letters of recommendation cited company-specific results without establishing a causal link or national scope. The Petitioner did not show his techniques were unique, innovative, or new to the field. The proposed endeavor would benefit individual companies that hire him rather than the nation broadly.