AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the letters on their face describe judging activity at the Municipal Museum of Art and for an exhibition jury. AAO noted that issues such as criteria for participation and scope of the events would be relevant only at the final merits stage, not to the threshold question of whether she served as a judge.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the letters on their face describe judging activity at the Municipal Museum of Art and for an exhibition jury. AAO noted that issues such as criteria for participation and scope of the events would be relevant only at the final merits stage, not to the threshold question of whether she served as a judge.
position offered same or similar to position certified by DOL
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the labor certification is not valid for the offered position, but rested its conclusion on additional grounds: differing minimum education/experience requirements in the Petitioner's job posting compared to the labor certification, a different job title, and a significantly higher proffered wage.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the labor certification is not valid for the offered position, but rested its conclusion on additional grounds: differing minimum education/experience requirements in the Petitioner's job posting compared to the labor certification, a different job title, and a significantly higher proffered wage.
None of the submitted evidence is from current or former employers, and the evidence lacks pertinent information such as hours worked and job duties to establish ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the submitted evidence is from current or former employers, and the evidence lacks pertinent information such as hours worked and job duties to establish ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur.
recognition for achievements and contributions (criterion F)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The three support letters were complimentary but did not contain objective information about specific achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the plain language of the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The three support letters were complimentary but did not contain objective information about specific achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the plain language of the criterion.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (criterion F)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The support letters focused on personal qualities, skill, and individual project accomplishments rather than providing evidence of recognition for significant contributions to the computer engineering field as a whole. Benefits accrued to individual clients rather than the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The support letters focused on personal qualities, skill, and individual project accomplishments rather than providing evidence of recognition for significant contributions to the computer engineering field as a whole. Benefits accrued to individual clients rather than the field.
license to practice profession or certification (criterion C)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner failed to explain what the registration council is, what the registration confers, whether it expires, or whether Brazil requires a license to practice computer engineering.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to explain what the registration council is, what the registration confers, whether it expires, or whether Brazil requires a license to practice computer engineering.