AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, though it noted the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold, though it noted the aggregate record does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
AAO had found the Petitioner did not establish he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor because his original proposed endeavor was medical research but he lacked any experience in that area; his shift to a physician endeavor was an impermissible material change to the petition. The motion did not address these findings or provide new supporting evidence.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO had found the Petitioner did not establish he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor because his original proposed endeavor was medical research but he lacked any experience in that area; his shift to a physician endeavor was an impermissible material change to the petition. The motion did not address these findings or provide new supporting evidence.
While the Petitioner's work as a security consultant has substantial merit, it does not rise to the level of national importance. The proposed endeavor does not sufficiently extend beyond her business and future clientele to impact the broader field or economy.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner's work as a security consultant has substantial merit, it does not rise to the level of national importance. The proposed endeavor does not sufficiently extend beyond her business and future clientele to impact the broader field or economy. The business plan's revenue and job creation projections lacked supporting evidence and detail, and the Petitioner failed to show significant prospective economic impact at the regional or national level.
official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found no qualifying academic record: the Petitioner attended law school but did not complete it, and law school does not relate to her claimed area of exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found no qualifying academic record: the Petitioner attended law school but did not complete it, and law school does not relate to her claimed area of exceptional ability.
AAO found the COVID-19 pandemic argument inapplicable because the petition was filed in April 2019, predating the pandemic, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. General industry reports did not address the specific endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the COVID-19 pandemic argument inapplicable because the petition was filed in April 2019, predating the pandemic, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. General industry reports did not address the specific endeavor. The business plan showed minimal staffing (three identified employees) at a home residential address not shown to be in an economically depressed area, and the record contained no specific data showing national or global implications from the company's operations.
AAO agreed that the credibility of the Beneficiary's employment history was undermined by repeated omissions across three DS-160 forms, that the pay statements lacked actual pay dates and contained identical errors suggesting they were generated for a different purpose, and that even crediting the undisputed employer letter the Beneficiary's full-time employment at that company was only ~17 months and 3 weeks—short of 24 mo…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the credibility of the Beneficiary's employment history was undermined by repeated omissions across three DS-160 forms, that the pay statements lacked actual pay dates and contained identical errors suggesting they were generated for a different purpose, and that even crediting the undisputed employer letter the Beneficiary's full-time employment at that company was only ~17 months and 3 weeks—short of 24 months.