leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner's failure on criteria (iv), (v), and (ix) was already dispositive of the appeal, making it unnecessary to address criterion (viii).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner's failure on criteria (iv), (v), and (ix) was already dispositive of the appeal, making it unnecessary to address criterion (viii).
AAO found the Director's final merits analysis fatally deficient for failing to consider the totality of the evidence, applying incorrect standards regarding first authorship and demanding a specific type of citation evidence, and failing to adequately explain the basis for denial. The matter is remanded for a proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's final merits analysis fatally deficient for failing to consider the totality of the evidence, applying incorrect standards regarding first authorship and demanding a specific type of citation evidence, and failing to adequately explain the basis for denial. The matter is remanded for a proper analysis.
The Digital Druck interview is not 'about' the Petitioner beyond his name and title, and the record lacks evidence that Digital Druck is a professional or major trade publication. Other articles do not mention the Petitioner, and one article post-dates filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Digital Druck interview is not 'about' the Petitioner beyond his name and title, and the record lacks evidence that Digital Druck is a professional or major trade publication. Other articles do not mention the Petitioner, and one article post-dates filing.
AAO remands for the Director to evaluate this criterion in the first instance, given that the Director failed to address it despite the Petitioner's specific claim.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO remands for the Director to evaluate this criterion in the first instance, given that the Director failed to address it despite the Petitioner's specific claim.
The petitioner has not submitted an official academic record showing a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, and without such evidence no experience can qualify as post-baccalaureate. The regulation does not allow ten years of experience alone to substitute for the degree requirement in this immigrant classification context.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner has not submitted an official academic record showing a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, and without such evidence no experience can qualify as post-baccalaureate. The regulation does not allow ten years of experience alone to substitute for the degree requirement in this immigrant classification context.
The record fails to show that the petitioner meets any of the exceptional ability criteria, and the petitioner has not demonstrated that the prior AAO decision was in error on this point.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record fails to show that the petitioner meets any of the exceptional ability criteria, and the petitioner has not demonstrated that the prior AAO decision was in error on this point.