Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO withdrew SCOPS's favorable finding because the Petitioner did not provide independent corroborating information on his role at the State Attestation Commission or as a book reviewer to demonstrate those activities met the plain language of judging the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS's favorable finding because the Petitioner did not provide independent corroborating information on his role at the State Attestation Commission or as a book reviewer to demonstrate those activities met the plain language of judging the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_02_B2203; source_row=45146 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The two commemorative badges were awarded to thousands of individuals across various fields for being 'active' and making a 'significant contribution,' not for excellence in a specific field of endeavor. The record did not establish the awards were for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The two commemorative badges were awarded to thousands of individuals across various fields for being 'active' and making a 'significant contribution,' not for excellence in a specific field of endeavor. The record did not establish the awards were for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_02_B2203; source_row=45143 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding. The Petitioner did not provide sufficient information on publishers to confirm the articles were published in professional or major trade publications, and the misrepresentation in the record cast doubt on the authenticity of the remaining documentation.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding. The Petitioner did not provide sufficient information on publishers to confirm the articles were published in professional or major trade publications, and the misrepresentation in the record cast doubt on the authenticity of the remaining documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=45134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Google Scholar profile was found to be fabricated and therefore not considered, along with the expert letter that relied on it. Remaining evidence lacked sufficient detail to corroborate major significance: the software co-inventor's email does not provide substantiated examples of major significance, and recommendation letters by co-researchers describe personal use without addressing broader field significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Google Scholar profile was found to be fabricated and therefore not considered, along with the expert letter that relied on it. Remaining evidence lacked sufficient detail to corroborate major significance: the software co-inventor's email does not provide substantiated examples of major significance, and recommendation letters by co-researchers describe personal use without addressing broader field significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=45133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding. The Petitioner provided no evidence of conference presentations and did not explain how her presentations or thesis submission meet the plain language of the criterion requiring display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' favorable finding. The Petitioner provided no evidence of conference presentations and did not explain how her presentations or thesis submission meet the plain language of the criterion requiring display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=45135 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's expert and support letters do not discuss her work on the admissions committee, and the record does not corroborate her statements or describe her role in sufficient detail to establish that her work amounts to judging the work of others in the same or allied field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's expert and support letters do not discuss her work on the admissions committee, and the record does not corroborate her statements or describe her role in sufficient detail to establish that her work amounts to judging the work of others in the same or allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=45132 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The email by the cited author does not address whether the Petitioner's doctoral degree amounts to a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award; it merely notes the degree was awarded in acknowledgement of her contributions. The appeal evidence does not cure the insufficiencies raised by SCOPS.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The email by the cited author does not address whether the Petitioner's doctoral degree amounts to a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award; it merely notes the degree was awarded in acknowledgement of her contributions. The appeal evidence does not cure the insufficiencies raised by SCOPS.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_01_B2203; source_row=45129 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew SCOPS' finding, concluding that the record lacked a sufficiently detailed description of the specific proposed endeavor and that the evidence spoke only to the general importance of the cybersecurity field, not to the Petitioner's particular endeavor. The Petitioner failed to provide copies of the reports he referenced, and his descriptions relied on generic terms unsupported by corroborating evidence.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew SCOPS' finding, concluding that the record lacked a sufficiently detailed description of the specific proposed endeavor and that the evidence spoke only to the general importance of the cybersecurity field, not to the Petitioner's particular endeavor. The Petitioner failed to provide copies of the reports he referenced, and his descriptions relied on generic terms unsupported by corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-24_04_B5203; source_row=45160 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c