Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 131–140
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the Beneficiary performed in a critical role for a company with distinguished reputation, based on revenue increase, patient expansion, and unique educational certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the Beneficiary performed in a critical role for a company with distinguished reputation, based on revenue increase, patient expansion, and unique educational certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=45102 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record showed the Beneficiary participated as a judge of others' work in his field, citing his role as an official examiner evaluating residents and participating in oral defenses of theses, analogous to serving on a Ph.D. dissertation committee.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record showed the Beneficiary participated as a judge of others' work in his field, citing his role as an official examiner evaluating residents and participating in oral defenses of theses, analogous to serving on a Ph.D. dissertation committee.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=45099 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
What the decision said
AAO declined to address the high salary criterion because the Petitioner already satisfied the required three criteria, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address the high salary criterion because the Petitioner already satisfied the required three criteria, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=45103 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner's book and blogs do not qualify as scholarly articles, but found that his peer-reviewed journal articles on AI, cloud computing, and software engineering, published in professional journals for learned persons in the field, did satisfy criterion (vi).
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner's book and blogs do not qualify as scholarly articles, but found that his peer-reviewed journal articles on AI, cloud computing, and software engineering, published in professional journals for learned persons in the field, did satisfy criterion (vi).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=45092 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record relating to the area of exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees the architecture degree is not in the area of exceptional ability (tattoo artistry) and the additional certificates are not shown to be from colleges, universities, schools, or comparable institutions of learning.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the architecture degree is not in the area of exceptional ability (tattoo artistry) and the additional certificates are not shown to be from colleges, universities, schools, or comparable institutions of learning.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-18_01_B5203; source_row=45082 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in a professional association (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdraws SCOPS' favorable finding because the record does not establish that APT membership requires a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, as APT admits licensed tattoo artists, apprentices, suppliers, and others without that requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdraws SCOPS' favorable finding because the record does not establish that APT membership requires a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, as APT admits licensed tattoo artists, apprentices, suppliers, and others without that requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-18_01_B5203; source_row=45083 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the convention awards demonstrate personal achievements but not significant contributions to the tattoo industry, and the recommendation letters describe the Petitioner's impact on specific employers rather than the industry as a whole.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the convention awards demonstrate personal achievements but not significant contributions to the tattoo industry, and the recommendation letters describe the Petitioner's impact on specific employers rather than the industry as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-18_01_B5203; source_row=45084 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that SCOPS conflated this analysis with contributions, but on de novo review concluded the Petitioner failed to establish that the Paid Media Acquisition Department—the relevant division—has a distinguished reputation, and that some submitted evidence post-dated the filing date or did not mention the company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that SCOPS conflated this analysis with contributions, but on de novo review concluded the Petitioner failed to establish that the Paid Media Acquisition Department—the relevant division—has a distinguished reputation, and that some submitted evidence post-dated the filing date or did not mention the company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_03_B2203; source_row=45079 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with SCOPS, finding that while the Petitioner's $264,000 base salary slightly exceeded the BLS 90th-percentile threshold for marketing managers, she failed to provide supporting evidence comparing her total remuneration to other executives or senior marketing managers in her geographic area.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with SCOPS, finding that while the Petitioner's $264,000 base salary slightly exceeded the BLS 90th-percentile threshold for marketing managers, she failed to provide supporting evidence comparing her total remuneration to other executives or senior marketing managers in her geographic area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_03_B2203; source_row=45080 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c