Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 141–150
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with SCOPS, finding the support letters contained conclusory statements without specific details explaining how the Petitioner's contributions had major significance in the broader field. AAO emphasized that letters must specifically describe the contribution and its significance, and that USCIS need not accept primarily conclusory statements.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with SCOPS, finding the support letters contained conclusory statements without specific details explaining how the Petitioner's contributions had major significance in the broader field. AAO emphasized that letters must specifically describe the contribution and its significance, and that USCIS need not accept primarily conclusory statements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_03_B2203; source_row=45078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIPhD0 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's graduate research, publications, limited citations, awards, peer review activity, and letters of support collectively did not demonstrate a record of success or progress sufficient to show she was well positioned. Her Ph.D.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's graduate research, publications, limited citations, awards, peer review activity, and letters of support collectively did not demonstrate a record of success or progress sufficient to show she was well positioned. Her Ph.D. alone was insufficient, her citations lacked comparative benchmarking and qualitative weight, her awards lacked demonstrated prestige, and no evidence of significant research funding was present.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=45067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters of recommendation make broad, unsupported statements without detailed specifics demonstrating how the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role, and lack corroborating documentation for claimed outcomes such as increased productivity and cost savings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters of recommendation make broad, unsupported statements without detailed specifics demonstrating how the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role, and lack corroborating documentation for claimed outcomes such as increased productivity and cost savings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=45063 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Robert Half data covered information security managers rather than IT specialists and did not specify the Petitioner's location; the Glassdoor and Indeed data showed only average or median salaries, which does not establish a 'high salary' relative to others in the field as required.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Robert Half data covered information security managers rather than IT specialists and did not specify the Petitioner's location; the Glassdoor and Indeed data showed only average or median salaries, which does not establish a 'high salary' relative to others in the field as required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=45064 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The senior membership requirements—professional occupation attainment and years of experience—do not reflect outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner failed to show that recognized national or international experts judge senior membership applications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The senior membership requirements—professional occupation attainment and years of experience—do not reflect outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner failed to show that recognized national or international experts judge senior membership applications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=45059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The YouTube video lacked the required author; the Wikipedia information was unreliable and failed to establish major media status; three of four online articles lacked required title, date, or author; and the remaining article's publication was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The YouTube video lacked the required author; the Wikipedia information was unreliable and failed to establish major media status; three of four online articles lacked required title, date, or author; and the remaining article's publication was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=45060 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awards lack evidence of recognition beyond the awarding organization's internal personnel actions, and because they honored only employees of the companies, they do not establish issuance for 'excellence in the field.'
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards lack evidence of recognition beyond the awarding organization's internal personnel actions, and because they honored only employees of the companies, they do not establish issuance for 'excellence in the field.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B2203; source_row=45058 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim and top of field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found no error in SCOPS' approach of considering step-one evidence in the final merits analysis, and independently concluded the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained acclaim or top-of-field status.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no error in SCOPS' approach of considering step-one evidence in the final merits analysis, and independently concluded the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained acclaim or top-of-field status. The letters were general and not indicative of acclaim from the broader field, the media coverage was limited to a few months and four articles, peer review was minimal (13 conference submissions and 1 journal review), and the publication record was too modest. The Petitioner's argument about operational anonymity in national security work did not cure the deficiencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_02_B2203; source_row=45076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published materials
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with SCOPS and found the Ad Age article, which named the Petitioner and discussed her and her team's contributions, satisfied the published materials criterion for a major trade publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with SCOPS and found the Ad Age article, which named the Petitioner and discussed her and her team's contributions, satisfied the published materials criterion for a major trade publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_03_B2203; source_row=45077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIPhD0 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with SCOPS on substantial merit but withdrew SCOPS' finding on national importance. AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated both substantial merit and national importance by showing broader implications in industrial engineering through dissemination via journals and conferences, and through letters of support.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS on substantial merit but withdrew SCOPS' finding on national importance. AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated both substantial merit and national importance by showing broader implications in industrial engineering through dissemination via journals and conferences, and through letters of support.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=45066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c