Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 171–180
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the endeavor is defined by and constricted to the Petitioner's role at his employer; broader impacts attributed to employer products are not shown to flow from the Petitioner's specific endeavor. Letters generically describe his work without concrete details of future impact, and economic/job-creation claims lack a sufficiently direct connection to the proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the endeavor is defined by and constricted to the Petitioner's role at his employer; broader impacts attributed to employer products are not shown to flow from the Petitioner's specific endeavor. Letters generically describe his work without concrete details of future impact, and economic/job-creation claims lack a sufficiently direct connection to the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_05_B5203; source_row=45055 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted the record in aggregate does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted the record in aggregate does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_02_B2203; source_row=45038 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI56 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with SCOPS on substantial merit, but withdrew SCOPS' conclusion on national importance. AAO found that the Petitioner's research on bio-inspired feature reduction, supported by letters discussing contributions to machine learning and evidence of dissemination, established both substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS on substantial merit, but withdrew SCOPS' conclusion on national importance. AAO found that the Petitioner's research on bio-inspired feature reduction, supported by letters discussing contributions to machine learning and evidence of dissemination, established both substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_01_B5203; source_row=45027 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the support letters primarily discussed the Petitioner's graduate research rather than his proposed endeavor as an employee, lacked specificity about prospective national impact, and were not backed by documentary evidence of DoD or U.S. Army interest in his specific work.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the support letters primarily discussed the Petitioner's graduate research rather than his proposed endeavor as an employee, lacked specificity about prospective national impact, and were not backed by documentary evidence of DoD or U.S. Army interest in his specific work. The record did not show that edge AI computing was integral to his employer's competition participation or that his work had widespread interest beyond benefits to his specific employer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=45052 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to reach the scholarly articles criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum of three criteria regardless, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the scholarly articles criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum of three criteria regardless, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=45024 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
roles
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the roles criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum of three criteria regardless, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the roles criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the minimum of three criteria regardless, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=45025 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that because the Petitioner is not well positioned to advance the endeavor, her contributions to pediatric cardiac medicine do not supersede the benefits of protecting the domestic labor supply through the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that because the Petitioner is not well positioned to advance the endeavor, her contributions to pediatric cardiac medicine do not supersede the benefits of protecting the domestic labor supply through the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=44996 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with SCOPS, finding the citation count for the single MPS II article unexplained as to field and self-citations, the publication record limited (two articles), insufficient evidence linking her article to the RUSP list addition, scholarship amounts nominal and not tied to her proposed research, no Ph.D.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS, finding the citation count for the single MPS II article unexplained as to field and self-citations, the publication record limited (two articles), insufficient evidence linking her article to the RUSP list addition, scholarship amounts nominal and not tied to her proposed research, no Ph.D. in a critical/emerging technology, and no comprehensive plan or current interest from universities or government funders.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=44995 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c