Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 251–260
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual
What the decision said
SCOPS did not analyze this criterion. AAO did not separately resolve it at step one but addressed the underlying evidence in the final merits analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
SCOPS did not analyze this criterion. AAO did not separately resolve it at step one but addressed the underlying evidence in the final merits analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_04_B2203; source_row=44938 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in international journals
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both SCOPS and AAO agreed that the Beneficiary satisfied this criterion based on authorship of scholarly articles in international professional journals.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both SCOPS and AAO agreed that the Beneficiary satisfied this criterion based on authorship of scholarly articles in international professional journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_03_B5203; source_row=44926 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
original scholarly research contributions of major significance in the field
Why the evidence was persuasive
SCOPS improperly discounted letters of support without analysis and made unsupported citation comparisons to unidentified scientists. AAO found that the totality of evidence—citation history, expert letters with first-hand knowledge, awards, and a patent application—established major significance of the Beneficiary's research contributions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
SCOPS improperly discounted letters of support without analysis and made unsupported citation comparisons to unidentified scientists. AAO found that the totality of evidence—citation history, expert letters with first-hand knowledge, awards, and a patent application—established major significance of the Beneficiary's research contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_03_B5203; source_row=44927 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The plain language of the labor certification requires only a master's degree with no experience, training, or special skills. The duties described in the Petitioner's letters are standard food scientist duties per O*NET and do not indicate the position requires exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of the labor certification requires only a master's degree with no experience, training, or special skills. The duties described in the Petitioner's letters are standard food scientist duties per O*NET and do not indicate the position requires exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_03_B5203; source_row=44930 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases (claimed via comparable evidence)
What the decision said
AAO noted the Petitioner claimed comparable evidence under this criterion in response to SCOPS' RFE but did not assert satisfaction on appeal, effectively waiving the claim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Petitioner claimed comparable evidence under this criterion in response to SCOPS' RFE but did not assert satisfaction on appeal, effectively waiving the claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_02_B2203; source_row=44919 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO does not reach a final merits conclusion and remands, though notes in dicta the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim and recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach a final merits conclusion and remands, though notes in dicta the record does not support a finding of the required acclaim and recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-10_03_B2203; source_row=44925 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because the Petitioner only demonstrated invitations to judge but not actual participation, and the underlying conference committee claims were contradicted by online archives showing the Petitioner was not listed as a committee member.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because the Petitioner only demonstrated invitations to judge but not actual participation, and the underlying conference committee claims were contradicted by online archives showing the Petitioner was not listed as a committee member.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-09_02_B2203; source_row=44898 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the evidence in the record primarily focused on the Petitioner's services, compliance obligations, and market share rather than the potential prospective impact of the Beneficiary's specific endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the evidence in the record primarily focused on the Petitioner's services, compliance obligations, and market share rather than the potential prospective impact of the Beneficiary's specific endeavor. The record did not sufficiently clarify how the Beneficiary's senior SIEM engineer role fit within the Petitioner's overall cybersecurity management, nor did it show the Beneficiary's position in the organizational structure. The alleged shortage of cybersecurity workers and CET classification were insufficient to establish national importance under Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-09_03_B5203; source_row=44907 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c