Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 281–290
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published materials
Why AAO was not persuaded
One claimed article was not independently documented (screenshots appeared to be part of a different article with no website address). The other article's major media status was not established because the Petitioner submitted only self-promotional material and uncontextualized SimilarWeb rankings.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
One claimed article was not independently documented (screenshots appeared to be part of a different article with no website address). The other article's major media status was not established because the Petitioner submitted only self-promotional material and uncontextualized SimilarWeb rankings. A third article (credited as authored by the Petitioner) never mentions the Petitioner substantively and is about malaria transmission rather than being about him and his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-05_01_B2203; source_row=44853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the evidence focused on the general importance of the automotive repair industry rather than the specific impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Business projections (up to 24 jobs and ~$4.2M in sales by year five) were unsupported and, even if accurate, not shown to constitute 'substantial positive economic effects' at a national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the evidence focused on the general importance of the automotive repair industry rather than the specific impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Business projections (up to 24 jobs and ~$4.2M in sales by year five) were unsupported and, even if accurate, not shown to constitute 'substantial positive economic effects' at a national level. Training programs and a claimed diagnostic method also lacked evidence of broader industry implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-05_04_B5203; source_row=44873 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found Petitioner had engineering experience and a published article but lacked any business-formation experience, his published research had no documented citations or adoption, letters of support expressed only preliminary non-binding interest with no follow-through, and his current H-1B employment precluded outside business activity.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner had engineering experience and a published article but lacked any business-formation experience, his published research had no documented citations or adoption, letters of support expressed only preliminary non-binding interest with no follow-through, and his current H-1B employment precluded outside business activity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-05_03_B5203; source_row=44870 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but expressly declined to reach national importance, reserving the issue under Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but expressly declined to reach national importance, reserving the issue under Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-05_03_B5203; source_row=44869 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that SCOPS had previously acknowledged the Petitioner's leading or critical role and that the Petitioner established the organization's distinguished reputation, thereby satisfying this criterion as the third needed for step one.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that SCOPS had previously acknowledged the Petitioner's leading or critical role and that the Petitioner established the organization's distinguished reputation, thereby satisfying this criterion as the third needed for step one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2026-03-05_02_B2203; source_row=44863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c