Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 551–560
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive failure on the first prong.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary given the dispositive failure on the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_11_B5203; source_row=44455 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO declined to address whether the Director correctly found the Petitioner is well positioned to advance her endeavor, as the prong 1 failure was dispositive of the appeal.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address whether the Director correctly found the Petitioner is well positioned to advance her endeavor, as the prong 1 failure was dispositive of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_10_B5203; source_row=44451 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the record demonstrates the petitioner's education, skills, knowledge, record of success in related efforts, a detailed plan for future activities, progress toward the proposed endeavor, and interest from other researchers, funders, and companies. AAO withdrew SCOPS's contrary determination.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record demonstrates the petitioner's education, skills, knowledge, record of success in related efforts, a detailed plan for future activities, progress toward the proposed endeavor, and interest from other researchers, funders, and companies. AAO withdrew SCOPS's contrary determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_05_B5203; source_row=44443 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both SCOPS and AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor—developing sustainable and advanced construction materials to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—has substantial merit and national importance. AAO did not separately re-analyze this prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
Both SCOPS and AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor—developing sustainable and advanced construction materials to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—has substantial merit and national importance. AAO did not separately re-analyze this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_05_B5203; source_row=44442 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reconsider - error of law or policy
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not identify any error of law or policy in AAO's most recent decision. Her arguments either misstated AAO's prior holdings (e.g., claiming AAO reversed a substantial-merit finding it never addressed), raised an unsupported ineffective-assistance claim under Lozada directed at SCOPS rather than AAO's most recent decision, or repeated prior disagreements with the national-importance determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not identify any error of law or policy in AAO's most recent decision. Her arguments either misstated AAO's prior holdings (e.g., claiming AAO reversed a substantial-merit finding it never addressed), raised an unsupported ineffective-assistance claim under Lozada directed at SCOPS rather than AAO's most recent decision, or repeated prior disagreements with the national-importance determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_06_B5203; source_row=44446 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reopen - new facts
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner relied on post-filing achievements and an expanded scope of endeavor, neither of which qualifies as new facts that existed at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner relied on post-filing achievements and an expanded scope of endeavor, neither of which qualifies as new facts that existed at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_06_B5203; source_row=44445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new business plan contains economic projections that remain uncorroborated, and the Petitioner has not demonstrated how the proposed consulting and training services would have broader implications for the trucking and automotive industries or reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The new business plan contains economic projections that remain uncorroborated, and the Petitioner has not demonstrated how the proposed consulting and training services would have broader implications for the trucking and automotive industries or reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_03_B5203; source_row=44438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The accountant's declaration is unsubstantiated and the meaning of 'withdrawals' is unclear, and the Salario BR data covers a different position and time period and is not a proper basis for comparison.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The accountant's declaration is unsubstantiated and the meaning of 'withdrawals' is unclear, and the Salario BR data covers a different position and time period and is not a proper basis for comparison.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-29_12_B5203; source_row=44459 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c